Newsgroups: alt.drugs From: [catalyst remailer] at [netcom.com] Subject: More "legalization" in the media :-). Date: Mon, 11 Apr 1994 11:13:07 -0700 id AA17091; Mon, 11 Apr 94 11:12:05 -0700 id LAA21031; Mon, 11 Apr 1994 11:13:07 -0700 X-Remailed-By: Remailer <[catalyst remailer] at [netcom.com]> ZURICH (Reuter) - At a railroad siding minutes from the opulent city center of Zurich, hundreds of people mill about, buying drugs at makeshift tables or injecting them into needle-marked veins in their arms, legs, even necks. A crackdown by city authorities, arresting dealers and chasing addicts off the streets, has not succeeded in removing the shivering, stupefied figures lying on the ground nor the blood-spattered syringes and swabs littered around them. The Zurich City Council has endured bitter disputes about cleaning up Europe's largest open drug scene. Its solutions have never been liberal enough for Emilie Lieberherr, the council's crusading head of social welfare, who says she will pursue a plan to shift the narcotics mecca to the city outskirts, despite retiring from her post at the end of last month. ``Together with some prominent Zurich artists, members of lawyers' organizations and a number of groups involved in the drugs scene we are going to set up a non-governmental group,'' Lieberherr told Reuters. ``A private group may be better able to achieve this than the government.'' Lieberherr originally made her proposal in 1992 but then, as now, it found little favor with the city government. But the first woman to be elected to the council is undeterred. She says the addicts and dealers who throng at an abandoned railroad siding in the Industriequartier cannot continue to be imposed on the residents of the area. The Industriequartier, a traditionally working class neighborhood, is close to the central station and a 10-minute walk from the city's opulent Bahnhofstrasse. Lieberherr is fuming over what she sees as the local government's repressive policies. Since the closure in early 1992 of Zurich's infamous ``Needle Park,'' where consumption and small-scale dealing was officially tolerated, the city government has clamped down on the drugs scene and now hounds addicts off the streets. Police keep a close watch on those who come to the Industriequartier siding. If they do not live in Zurich they are arrested and forced to return home. ``It makes me furious that people -- even colleagues of mine (on the city council) -- believe not only that with repression but by chasing addicts around the streets this problem can be solved,'' Lieberherr said. ``And this picking up of addicts and sending them back to their home cantons is an absolute waste of time. The next day they simply come back again. Addicts go to wherever they can get hold of the drugs they need.'' The city government denies its policy is solely repressive, arguing that it also provides medical help for drug addicts. Lieberherr says her proposal will take the unsightly scene away from the centre of Zurich and will offer the addicts a better environment than their trackside squalor. She wants to set up two centers on the outskirts of Zurich, away from residential areas, where addicts would be allowed to consume and Swiss dealers to set up a small-scale drugs market. Foreign dealers are seen as having caused the violence that led to the closure of ``Needle Park.'' Lieberherr's project, to be financed by private donations and charities, would also offer social and medical help and advice on withdrawal from addiction. The only lasting solution to the drug problem, not only in Zurich but worldwide, Lieberherr says, is legalisation. ``This problem can only be solved with the legalisation of drug consumption. Legalization does not mean total freedom to consume, but it means a supervised consumption that will break and destroy the Mafia-like power of drugs dealers,'' she said. ``It's the same phenomenon as alcohol prohibition in the United States in the 1930s, but so many people do not want to see this.''