From: [voltai 29] at [chelsea.ios.com] (Voltaire) Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.usa.congress,alt.politics.usa.newt-gingrich Subject: #Florida Appeal Court Affirms Class Action For Tobacco Lawsuit Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 12:26:15 GMT Florida Appeal Court Affirms Class Action For Tobacco Lawsuit Tom Well of the Associated Press, January 31, 1996 MIAMI (AP) - In a major setback for the tobacco industry, a Florida appeals court on Wednesday gave class action status to a lawsuit filed on behalf of people who are addicted to cigarettes or whose health has been impaired by smoking. The lawsuit, one of several such actions against the tobacco industry, applies only to residents of Florida. It seeks to force the industry to pay billions of dollars in damages, and create a fund to diagnose and treat smoking-related illnesses. "This is a very significant lawsuit, one of perhaps five lawsuits that are pending," said John Banzhaf, a law professor at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. He is executive director of the anti-smoking organization, Action on Smoking and Health. "It is significant because as far as I know it is the highest state court to rule on this so far as a class action ... and because it opens the way for class action lawsuits in most of the other states," he said. A class action in the lawsuit means that any Florida smoker who believes he became addicted to cigarettes or whose health was harmed by smoking could join in any benefits that might come out a settlement. Other similar lawsuits against the tobacco industry have been filed in Minnesota, Mississippi and West Virginia. A federal district court in New Orleans has certified a lawsuit against the tobacco industry as a class action, but that appeal has not been heard. The Florida lawsuit, certified as a class-action by the Third District Court of Appeal in Miami, is against 13 cigarette manufacturers and industry organizations. One of the largest, R.J. Reynolds, will challenge the ruling in court, said the company's senior vice president, Daniel W. Donahue. "It's too early to decide, but we'll do something," he said. Philip Morris said it would ask for a rehearing by the appeals court, and failing that, appeal to the Florida Supreme Court. The Miami attorney who filed the lawsuit, Stanley M. Rosenblatt, said he believed the case will be tried by early 1997. Rosenblatt also filed a class action lawsuit in 1991 on behalf of airline flight attendants, nonsmokers who said their health had been damaged by working in a smoking environment. That case is still pending. The six initial plaintiffs in the lawsuit ruled on Wednesday include 74-year-old Miami Beach pediatrician Howard A. Engle, who claimed he tried to stop smoking scores of times, and Robert Angell, a 61-year-old North Dade County man who lost his larynx to cancer and smoked his last cigarette as he was wheeled into the operating room in 1984. The lawsuit charges that cigarette manufacturers have known for more than 25 years that nicotine is addictive and that smoking causes disease, but have "intentionally suppressed scientific and medical evidence."