From: [m--h] at [io.com]
Newsgroups: alt.activism,alt.activism.d,alt.drugs,alt.psychoactives,alt.society.resistance,alt.wired,talk.politics.drugs
Subject: DRUGS - Seminar on UN Conventions
Date: 11 Jun 94 01:48:45 GMT

[DISCLAIMER: This message is simply an informational forward for online
activists in other areas; it does not in any way, shape or form represent
the ideas, stance, positions, policy, or opinions of EFF.]

Forwarded message:
From: [f--ge--e] at [io.com] (FringeWare Inc)
Subject: DRUGS - Seminar on UN Conventions
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 1994 11:57:18 -0600 (MDT)

Sent from: [h--rm--s] at [selway.umt.edu] (Christopher P Howard)

>From:[L Giannini] at [agora.stm.it]

INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR : FOR A REVISION OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTIONS ON

DRUGS

ROME 27 - 28 MAY 1994

DRAFT PARLIAMENTARY MOTION


- Considering that the current prohibitionist regime applied to drugs has
not only been unable to check the spread of drug-taking, but has also
transformed clandestine drug-trafficking into the most profitable business
on the planet with an annual volume of trade in the order of five hundred
billion dollars, according to UN estimates;

- finding that the power wielded by criminal organizations undermines the
foundations of legal institutions and threatens the rule of law.,
particularly in producer countries in which a parallel system of
territorial control flourishes;.

- considering that it is now widely acknowledged that having generated the
above effects the "war against drugs, declared thirty years ago with the
introduction of the prohibitionist regime, has been well and truly lost;

- considering that presuming to  prohibit "drugs" from countries in the
South of the World but not "drugs" (alcohol and tobacco) from the North of
the World, is one of the major contradictions of the prohibitionist regime;

- finding that drugs circulate freely in our society despite
prohibitionism;

- finding that governments, and regional and local institutions, are
devising alternatives to a repressive strategy;  and that the
Constitutional Courts in various countries are opting with increasing
frequency for the depenalization or legalization of drug use;

- finding that measures such as "harm reduction", that correspond to
irremissible requirements of justice and public health, are not a
sufficient means for making any real headway in the battle against
drug-trafficking and organized crime, as they do not undermine the illegal
drug market;;

- finding that national laws actually adopt the provisions made by the
three UN Conventions: the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961; the
Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971, and the Vienna Convention on
Illicit Traffick of 1988;

- considering that in order to modify the prohibitionist regime presently
in force throughout the world it is necessary to take action resulting in
the presentation by one or more governments of instruments of denunciation
or amendment of the above-mentioned Conventions, according to the
procedures laid down by these Conventions, also with the aim of having an
international conference called on the matter;

- considering that while the purely repressive nature of the 1988
Convention leaves no room for improvement, the 1961 Convention - and
consequently that of 1971 - can be amended in such a way as to extend the
exclusively medical and scientific uses to "other" uses with regard to the
manufacture, export, import, distribution, trade, use and possession of
legally controlled drugs, while at the same time continuing to prohibit the
use of certain particularly dangerous substances.


Engages the government

1) To denounce the Vienna Convention on Illicit Traffick of 1988, in
accordance with Article 30 of said Convention;

2) To present amendments to the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961
- in accordance with Article 47 of said Convention - that will result in
the calling of a Conference of the Contracting Parties regarding said
amendments:

>>>>Amendment No. 1

Modify the Preamble as follows:

"The Parties

Concerned with the issues of public health and social peace,

Recognizing that the use of these substances for medical or scientific
purposes is indispensable for the relief of pain and that it should not be
subject to any unjustified restrictions,

Recognizing that their use is legitimate if it corresponds to customary
habits or is expression of individual freedom as recognized by the
Universal Conventions on human rights, subject to the condition that it
does not cause harm to others,

Determined to prevent and combat the abuse of these substances and illicit
traffic which it engenders,

Deeply concerned by the magnitude of and the rising trend in the illicit
production of, demand for and traffic in narcotic drugs, which adversely
affect the economic, cultural and legal foundations of society,

Deeply concerned also by the steadily increasing inroads into various
social groups made by illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and in particular
amongst the young exploited by drug traffickers,

Recognizing the links between illicit traffic and other related  organized
criminal activities which undermine the legitimate economies and threaten
the stability, security and sovereignty of States,

Aware that illicit traffic generates significant financial profits enabling
criminal organizations to pentrate and corrupt the structures of government
and legitimate commercial and financial business,

Understanding that effective measures against abuse of narcotic drugs
require coordinated and universal action,

Acknowledging the competence of the United Nations in the field of
narcotics control and desirous that the international organs concerned
exercise their activities within the framework of that Organization,

Desiring to conclude a generally acceptable international Convention
replacing all existing treaties, limiting such drugs to medical and
scientific or other uses, whilst ensuring protection against abuse of
society and third parties,

Finally desiring to combat illicit traffic effectively by a system of
legalized control in which the health and social risk of the controlled
substances is taken into account and the various cultural, economic and
legal aspects  of the problem,

Hereby agree as follows:"

>>>>Amendment No. 2

After paragraph 1.1.y, add a new paragraph 1.1.z as follows:
"the term "and other legitimate purposes" indicates the uses that
correspond to a customary habit or is expression of individual freedom
subject to the condition that it does not cause harm to others".

>>>>Amendment No. 3

Modify Article 3(iii) as follows:

"If the World Health Organization finds that a substance in Schedule I is
capable of being used for medical or scientific purposes, the Commission,
on the recommendation of the WHO, can include the substance in
Schedule II."

>>>>Amendment No. 4

Add the words "and other legitimate purposess" to:

Article 4(c) after the words "medical, scientific"
and before "purposes"
Article 9(4) after the words "medical, scientific"
and before "purposes"
Article 12(5) after the words "medical, scientific"
and before "purposes"
Article 19(1) after the words "medical, scientific"
and before "purposes"
Article 21(1) after the words "medical, scientific"
and before "purposes"

>>>>Amendment No.5

Delete paragraph 2 of Article 14 and Article 22 in its entirety.

>>>>Amendment No.6

Insert the following phrase in Article 30(b):

"This requirement need not apply to such drugs as individuals may lawfully
obtain, use, dispense or administer"

>>>>Amendment No. 7

Modify Article 33 as follows:

"l.  The Parties shall not permit the possession or use of drugs included
in Schedule IV except under legal authority.

     2.  The Parties may prohibit the use of drugs in      certain
circumstances, but only where such use      degenerates into abuse which is
harmful to society or      dangerous for third parties."


3) To present similar amendments, mutatis mutandis, to the Convention on
Psychotropic Substances of 1971.