From: [m b tst 3] at [pitt.edu] (Michael B Tierney) Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs,alt.hemp Subject: DPF poster Date: 17 Mar 1994 03:08:09 GMT Greetings! Below is the text of a poster put out by the Drug Policy Foundation. The section listing the board of directors was originally a large list of people, but it was done in a tiny font that wouldn't scan for anything, so I just pieced in the board of directors taken from the DPF pamphlet. Once again, this is a beta version, spelling errors or whatever send to me. Thanks and enjoy! -me THE DRUG WAR: Q: WILL THE NEXT $150 BILLION MAKE YOU SAFER? A: Not if we spend it on the same old strategy. Since 1981, well over 150 billion of our tax dollars have gone to fight the war on illegal drugs. Annual spending has grown so fast that the next $150 billion will be spent by 1997. But if we do not change our basic drug strategy, it is unlikely we will be any safer. Current drug policies cannot deal with the excess crime, violence and disease caused by drug prohibition. * FACT: According to FBI data, 1 out of 3 robberies and burglaries is committed to obtain money for high-priced, black market drugs. * FACT: Up to 40 percent of the murders in major cities and 20 percent of the killings nationwide occur in the drug trade. Innocent children and police officers are often caught in the crossfire. * FACT: 1 out of 3 U.S. AIDS cases is traceable to the sharing of infected needles by drug users. Criminalizing these users and prohibiting access to clean needles worsens the deadly AIDS epidemic. These are just a few of the costs and consequences of maintaining strict drug prohibition policies. This great nation can do better. With less waste. With more success dealing with hard-core users. And without fueling a war in our cities. Full legalization is not the only alternative. Different policies might make sense for different drugs. Many options are available, including decriminalizing users only, permitting doctors to prescribe some drugs to addicts to undercut the black market, borrowing elements of the European public health model, or shifting the allocation of anti-drug resources to focus mainly on treatment and prevention rather than drug law enforcement. No one can claim to know precisely what is best--not legalization advocates, not prohibition's partisans. We all share concern over the problems caused by drug abuse in our society, but we must also concern ourselves with the harm caused by our policies.The question of pursuing alternatives must be fully and realistically investigated and debated. What we cannot do is sit idly by while our nation continues to pursue misguided drug policies. Much like alcohol prohibition did, our modern prohibition: * Enriches Gangsters. At least $40 billion each year goes to the criminal underworld as proceeds from drug sales. * Endangers and corrupts police. Police officers risk their lives enforcing prohibition - but each drug dealer caught is immediately replaced. Drug profits have tempted too many public servants to become criminals themselves. * Fails to protect our children. Banned drugs are often easier for our kids to get than regulated drugs like alcohol and tobacco. Pushers have a financial incentive to draw children into the drug trade and to initiate them into drug use. As a candidate for president, Bill Clinton defined insanity as "doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result." Despite some recent, commendable shifts in strategy, that is what our nation is doing now in drug policy. It's time for change. The Drug Policy Foundation Drug Policy Foundation Board of Directors: President Arnold S. Trebach, J.D., Ph.D.; Vice President Kevin B. Zeese, Esq. Secretary-Treasurer Marjorie A. Rosner; Geraldine Barrett Washington;lraGlasser,A.C.L.U.,NewYork;PatrickV.Murphy, N.Y. Police Department Commissioner (ret.), Washington, D.C.; Wesley C. Pomeroy, Independent Review Panel, Dade County, Fla.; Joanne Sgro, Esq., Washington; Ronald Sinoway, Esq., Phillipsville, Calif. Board of Advisors: Chairman Richard J. Dennis; Barry Beyerstein, Ph.D., Simon Fraser Univ., Canada; David D. Boaz, Cato Inst., Washington; Anthony Burton, Esq., Drug Policy Fdn. U.K.; Richard C. Cowan, N.O.R.M.L., Wash- ington, Luigi Del Gatto, M.D., Intl. Anti-Prohibitionist League, Italy; Patricia Erickson, Ph.D., Addiction Research Fdn., Canada; Lester Grinspoon, M.D., Harvard Medical School; Jane Hendtlass, Ph.D., Rodie Research, Australia; Rufus King, Esq., Washington; Frederick H. Meyers, M.D., Univ. of Calif., San Francisco; John P. Morgan, M.D., City Univ. of N.Y. Medical School; Ethan Nadelmann, J.D., Ph.D., Princeton Univ.; Craig Reinarman, Ph.D., Univ. of Calif., Santa Cruz; Marsha Rosenbaum, Ph.D., Inst. forScientificAnalysis, San Francisco; Frits ROter, Prof. Dr., Univ. of Amsterdam; Carl Sagan, Ph.D., Cornell Univ., Ralph Salerno, N.Y. Police Dept. (ret.), Lake Ariel, Pa.; The Hon. Kurt L. Schmoke, Mayor, Baltimore, Md.; Alan Silber, Esq., New York; Michael Stepanian, Esq., Haight- Ashbury Free Clinic San Francisco; Thomas Szasz, M.D., State Univ. of N.Y., Syracuse; Carole Tongue, European Parlia- ment, U.K.; Grant Wardlaw, Ph.D., Australian Inst. of Criminology, Andrew Weil, M.D., Univ. of Arizona; Steven Wisotsky, Esq, Nova Univ. Law Center, Fla.; Alex Wodak, M.D., St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia The Drug Policy Foundatlon is a non-profit organlzation that promotes open debate on drug pollcy and provides Information on alternatives. Though some of its members support drug legalization, the Foundation takes no position on that issue. The focus of the Foundation's work -- in conferences, publications and television productions -- is public education. With your financial support, the Foundation can expand its public education campaign--including running more ads like thls one. We neither seek nor accept government funding. Without the generosity of concerned citizens and private foundations, our work would be impossible. If you agree that reform of drug policy is important, we need your support. Contributions to the Drug Policy Foundatlon are tax deductlble. Members receive our bi-monthly journal, The Drug Policy Letter. To promote debate yourself, send copies of this advertisement to President Clinton and your other elected representatives. Get involved! -- Mike Tierney "..only here did the human soul in a higher sense [m b t] at [pitt.edu] acquire depth and become evil - and these are the [m b tst 3] at [pitt.edu] two basic respects in which man has hitherto been CIS:70604,1512 superior to other beasts!" - Nietzsche