From: [c d t] at [sw.stratus.com] (C. D. Tavares) Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns,soc.culture.usa,alt.politics.clinton,alt.president.clinton,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.journalism.criticism,misc.headlines,alt.politics.org.batf Subject: Re: VIDEO OF FLAME THROWING TANKS EXISTS (Was Re: BATF Cover-up Attempt for Waco, TX Massacre) Date: 28 Sep 1993 03:12:31 GMT [s--o--t] at [ryptyde.nix.com] (Scott McClure) writes: > That seems like a serious problem to me. That doesn't change the fact > that the BATF screwed up, but we still need to look at all available > info. No, we need to look at all available OBJECTIVE info. The government said the BD's had auto weapons; the government was never able to produce any. The government said they themselves went in without full auto weapons; the videotape shows otherwise. The government said they had to attack because Koresh was heavily armed; when Koresh held them off, the government said they never suspected he was so well armed. The government said they couldn't arrest Koresh because he was holed up in the compound; neighbors said he jogged and went out to the store regularly. The government said they moved the raid up several days; the search warrant they had expired on the day they actually used it. The government said they needed to investigate to find out who tipped off the media; the government discovered it was the BATF's own public relations office. The government said that the gas they used was not flammable; then they said on CNN that they used acetone as a dispersant. The government said they would play Koresh's audio tape on nationwide radio, unedited; they played it on local radio, edited. The government held an investigation; then the government got caught "accidentally" providing "edited" versions of the 911 tapes to Congress. The government tried passing a regulation exempting their investigation from the FOIA -- when the public expressed its outrage, they claimed they really didn't mean what they wrote in the regulation. The government said Koresh was banging children. Do you have any clue now why I don't really give a flying &^@$# what the government says? > Without detailed info on exactly how the planning was done, and how it was > executed, it's kind of hard to form a clear picture of the events and how > they transpired. Good as it is, CNN is hardly the end-all be-all of > information sources. This thread is full of wild speculation, and typical > leftist anti-establishment conspiracy crap. Not much real substance. After all this, you still expect "substance" from the government? -- [c d t] at [rocket.sw.stratus.com] --If you believe that I speak for my company, OR [c d t] at [vos.stratus.com] write today for my special Investors' Packet...