From: [g--ff--n] at [primenet.com] (geoff beneze) Newsgroups: rec.guns Subject: Project Gun - Fire Lapping Date: 2 Sep 1996 08:39:32 -0400 Well, here are some results. If you'll remember, I'm starting out with a box stock Ruger M77 MkII V/T in 308 with the Tasco World Class Target model 6x24. At this point I've done virtually NO load development. The load I'm using is 41 gr. Win 748 with a Sierra 168 HPBT Match King set .005" off the lands. This is going to be my test bed, and I'll include Cryo treatment of the barrel, bedding and any other goodies I can think of that don't cost more than the gun. As some of you will recall, the first step in this game was going to be fire lapping the barrel. Ron and I both did this over the holiday weekend to our respective 308's. I'm using the kit from NECO and fired a sequence of 10 - 220 grit, 12- 400 grit, 15 - 800 grit and 30 - 1200 grit. We cleaned barrels at REGULAR, but logical intervals throughout the process, (e.g. five shots for 220, six shots for 400, five shots for 800, and six shots for 1200.) I've used two different measuring systems, one by hand, outer edge to outer edge minus bullet diameter. THEN I used Recreational Software's "Gun Control." With this software, you hold the target to the screen, then click through the bullet holes. The program calculates all kinds of interesting stuff. While my measurements are somewhat smaller than those calculated by GC (oddly enough) the ratio of the difference is the same for either method (that is, the difference between the two sets of groups using my method and their is the same.) Soooo, on the theory that the computer can't lie as well as I can, I'll use the figures from GC. In these figures, I've included EVERY group fired, including those that I KNEW I'd thrown a flyer, and those that looked perfect and sent one off into the boonies. Also a factor in these numbers is the fact that in the valley where I have my range, the wind ALWAYS blows at 90 degrees to the direction of fire. In short, I've done everything in MY power to have the numbers be absolutely REAL without my imagination or desire effecting the outcome. Ok, ready for numbers? Before the fire lapping started, on three different days, I fired a total of 15 THREE shot groups. The GC average for these groups (flyers and all) was 1.04" (sorry, I'm NOT going to get down to three our four places.) After lapping (finished this morning), I've fired 10 THREE shot groups. The GC average for these groups is (drum roll) .82" I'm smiling, and cleaning the gun is amazing, the patch goes through the barrel with almost NO resistance and comes clean in 1/2 the "normal" time. Further testimonial for lapping. I lapped the barrel on a 1911 single stack I'm building. When new, this barrel was a lead mine, now it looks like a mirror and I get the slightest amount of leading right in front of the chamber. Normally I'll soak the barrel in MP-7 for a couple of hours, then brush the snot out of it and it's clean - WONDERFUL. In a nutshell, fire lapping has ME convinced from a couple of different directions. All my accuracy guns will now get this treatment. The next stop for the Ruger is probably going to be glass bedding, then Cryo treatment. -- From: [g--ff--n] at [primenet.com] (geoff beneze) Newsgroups: rec.guns Subject: Re: Project Gun - Fire Lapping Date: 3 Sep 1996 00:59:01 -0400 In article <50eki4$[b c n] at [xring.cs.umd.edu]>, [g--ff--n] at [primenet.com] (geoff beneze) wrote: # Well, here are some results. If you'll remember, I'm starting out with a # box stock Ruger M77 MkII V/T in 308 with the Tasco World Class Target # model 6x24. At this point I've done virtually NO load development. The # load I'm using is 41 gr. Win 748 with a Sierra 168 HPBT Match King set # .005" off the lands. This is going to be my test bed, and I'll include # Cryo treatment of the barrel, bedding and any other goodies I can think of # that don't cost more than the gun. One bit of data I didn't have when I posted this. As per predictions for the fire lapping process, I have "realized" a drop in velocity. The before velocity was 2665 and the after was 2585, a drop of approximately 85 fps. Stay tuned for the next episode, glass bedding and results (around the first weekend of October) -- geoff beneze *************************************** * Arizona Shooting Sports * * http://www.primenet.com/~geoffben * * The UNOFFICIAL, unofficial * * Dillon Tech Page * * NRA Life member * ***************************************