From: [tom brunetti] at [satalink.com] (Tom Brunetti) Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns Subject: Just One Life, 1 of 3 Date: 21 Jul 93 13:49:35 GMT I saw this on Fido(Anews) and thought it was interesting, Pretty good editorial in my opinion. This message was from DENNIS SANTIAGO to ALL originally in conference ANEWS(Fido and was forwarded to you by AGATA ---------------------------------------- Op Ed Piece Still No Solutions In Place to Save "Just One Life" (Part 1 of 3) contact: Dennis L. L. Santiago Telecommuter WorkSystems - Los Angeles P.O. Box 3349 El Segundo, California 90245 bbs (310)676-0492 or Fidonet address (1:102/230) Los Angeles, July-9-1993 - It's happened again. A disgruntled stranger bent on an irrational murder-suicide came into the supposedly "safe" environment of a San Francisco high-rise. The offices of a professional services firm no less. People, not unlike you and I, were killed and injured for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. We've see this before. There was Stockton, California where the sanctuary of our schools was violated. There was Killeen, Texas where the notion of safety in public was exposed as myth. Now San Francisco, California where the thin veil of corporate rules, building management policies, and municipal codes was exposed as nothing more than a pile of paper. The pattern has been the same. One person out of 250+ million people in the United States succumbs to the stress of a combination of personal and societal problems and tragedy occurs. This person is by definition both mentally disturbed and operationally resourceful. Prior to the incident, this person is for the most part unknown to or very low on the priority list of trouble makers of law enforcement agencies. A bit of a misfit by the standards of political correctness perhaps; maybe not. Probably a fellow down on his luck one way or another. But otherwise pretty ordinary. It doesn't take much to reason that there are more of these walking time-bombs out there. Certainly, the economic times aren't helping alleviate any stresses. Conventional law enforcement is next to useless for dealing with this type of crime. Notwithstanding the myth of the government as an institutional nanny, the fact remains that law enforcement is neither equipped nor empowered to actively monitor or pass judgement on the mental stability of 250+ million Americans. Yet this is the massive level of intrusion that would be needed to locate these very rare individuals out of our population actually in the process of preparing to commit a murder-suicide. It's a needle in a haystack problem. The cost would be prohibitive to say the least. Then come the civil rights implications. Even if the data collection process were successful, U.S. law's presumption of innocence means that nothing can be done until an overt act of aggression occurs in any case. On the interdiction side of the equation, conventional law enforcement is not very effective either. Response oriented agencies are simply not designed to interdict this type of crime until well after the bulk of the damage has been done. These are crimes that require active intervention in the first few seconds if loss of live is to be truly minimized. The only way to do that is to have an authorized person able to provide such interdiction in position at the moment that the threat emerges. This isn't controversial theory; after all, it's the protective strategy afforded to high public officials. Realistically, no amount of investment in a conventional police force can cost- effectively provide such coverage to the aggregate population. So what does one do about the threat of infrequent irrational attack by a basically undetectable perpetrator? How does one go about implementing policies which stand a reasonable chance of saving "just one life"? Let's look at what's been tried. * OLX 2.1 TD * TWS-LA - Working to Raise the Common Denominator --- WM v2.08/93-0237 * Origin: Telecommuter_WorkSystems_LA 310/676-0492 (1:102/230)