From: [c z guris] at [ix.netcom.com] (Christopher Zguris)
To: [C--R--T] at [tomahawk.welch.jhu.edu]
Subject: Interesting crime stat's

This came from bodyguard-l, I _know_ we've been over gun-control, but I
thught this was worth forwarding.

Chris

>*******
>
>"Crime Control through the Private Use of
>Armed Force" by Professor Gary Kleck appeared in the 2/88 issue
>of *Social Problems*.
>  
>The following chart is from the article:
>   
>Attack, Injury and Crime Completion Rates in Robbery Incidents
>    
>Method of           % Completed     % Attacked     % Injured    Num Times
>Self Protection                                                  Used(a)
>     
>Used gun                30.9            25.2            17.4       89,009
>Used Knife              35.2            55.6            40.3       59,813
>Used other weapon       28.9            41.5            22.0      104,700
>Used physical force     50.1            75.6            50.8    1,653,880
>Tried to get help
>or frighten offender    63.9            73.5            48.9    1,516,141
>Threatened or reasoned
>with offender           53.7            48.1            30.7      955,398
>Nonviolent resistance,
>including evasion       50.8            54.7            34.9    1,539,895
>Other measures          48.5            47.3            26.5      284,423
>Any self-protection     52.1            60.8            38.2    4,603,671
>No self-protection      88.5            41.5            24.7    2,686,960
> 
>Total                   65.4            53.7            33.2    7,290,631
>       
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Attack, Injury and Crime Completion Rates in Assault Incidents
> 
>Method of            % Attacked     % Injured    Estimated
>Self Protection                                 Num Times Used(a)
> 
>Used gun                23.2            12.1       386,083
>Used Knife              46.4            29.5       123,062
>Used other weapon       41.4            25.1       454,570
>Used physical force     82.8            52.1     6,638,823
>Tried to get help
>or frighten offender    55.2            40.1     4,383,117
>Threatened or reasoned
>with offender           40.0            24.7     5,743,008
>Nonviolent resistance,
>including evasion       40.0            25.5     8,935,738
>Other measures          36.1            20.7     1,451,103
>Any self-protection     49.5            30.7    21,801,957
>No self-protection      39.9            27.3     6,154,763
> 
>Total                   47.3            29.9    27,956,719
> 
>Notes: (a) Separate frequencies these columns do add totals in "Any
>self-protection" row since a single criminal incident can involve more
>than self-protection method. Sources: Analysis of incident files of
>1979-1985 National Crime Survey public use computer tapes
>(ICPSR,1987b).
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>"Robbery and assault victims who used firearms for protection were
>less likely to be attacked or injured than victims who responded in
>any other manner. Only 17% of those using guns to resist attempted
>robbery and 12% using guns to resist assault suffered any kind of
>injuries. 25% of robbery victims and 27% of assault victims who did
>not resist were injured anyway."
> 
>"...Dr. Kleck estimates annually, "gun-wielding civilians in self-
>defense or some other legally justified cause" kill between 1,500
>and 2,800 felons -- or 2 1/2 to seven times as many criminals as
>are shot dead by police."
> 
>"Dr. Kleck estimates "there were about 8,700-16,600 non-fatal, legally
>permissible woundings of criminals by gun armed civilians" annually,
>and "the rest of the one million estimated defensive gun uses, over
>98% involved neither killings nor woundings but rather warning shots
>fired or guns pointed or referred to."
>
==========================================================================
   Christopher Zguris,  [c z guris] at [ix.netcom.com]  -or- [c z guris] at [mcimail.com]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Taxation is not a method by which the community corporately
   provides itself with essential services, but a fund to be
   divided between different interests with political claims
   upon the state.
            - Neville Chamberlain: Budget speech
              in the House of Commons, 1934
==========================================================================

 -----------------------------


-------------------------URL is "http://tomahawk.welch.jhu.edu:1080/"
-------------------FTP is "ftp://tomahawk.welch.jhu.edu/pub/politics"
[breinhar] at [tomahawk.welch.jhu.edu] (Robert Bryan Reinhardt)
With explicit reservation of all rights, Without Prejudice, UCC 1-207

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 18:41:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: breinsav (TOMAHAWK-LIST-PROCESSOR)
To: noban
Subject: Fwd: No Subject (fwd)

Forwarded message:
Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 15:54:22 -0400
Old-Return-Path: <[JERRYSYS 21] at [aol.com]>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 15:54:22 -0400
To: [N--B--N] at [tomahawk.welch.jhu.edu]
Subject: Fwd: No Subject
Resent-From: [N--B--N] at [tomahawk.welch.jhu.edu]

Sorry for the unrelated bandwidth, but I thought somke of you might be
interested to see the response from NPR to my email on the gun ban story.
 They narrowed right in on my area of concern, don't you think?

Jerry Wootan
---------------------
Forwarded message:
From: [A--C] at [npr.org] (All Things Considered - NPR News)
To: [JERRYSYS 21] at [aol.com]
Date: 95-04-19 14:59:59 EDT





Thanks for your e-mail. We do read all correspondence, but the volume of mail

we receive makes this form letter necessary. Listen next Thursday, when we
read 
from letters to the program.  


***Press Releases/Mailing Lists***

This account <[A--C] at [npr.org]> has been opened to provide listeners a way 
to comment on what they hear on the weekday edition of ALL THINGS CONSIDERED.

(Note: The weekend edition of ATC <WATC> has its own address.) It is 
not to be used for press releases or other bulk-mailed material. Please 
send that kind of information to us through the USPS.  If this address has 
been included as part of a mailing list, please remove it.  Thank you for 
your cooperation.



We welcome your ideas, your comments and your suggestions. 

You're welcome to explore our WWW, Gopher, and limited FTP:
  <http://www.npr.org/>
  <gopher://gopher.npr.org>
  <ftp://ftp.npr.org>

If you are looking for that Kugel receipe here it is:
A Jewish Homesteader's Potato Kugel.  
From Joan Nathan's JEWISH COOKING IN AMERICA
6
ingredients:
1/4 cup rendered chicken fat or vegetable oil
1 cup chopped onions
1 cup chopped leeks
2 pounds russet potatoes peeled and grated coarsely.
2 tablespoons fresh parsely, dill or basil6
4 large eggs, well beaten

Salt and freshly ground pepper to taste.

1. Heat 2 tablespoons of the chicken fat or vegetable oil in an 8-inch
skillet.
   Add onions and leeks and saute until golden.
2. Remove, cool slightly, and mix with the potatoes, parsley, and the eggs in
a
mixing bowl. Season with salt and pepper.
3. Place the remaining 3 tablespoons of chicken fat or oil in the
sides and bottom of a 13 by 8 inch oval grain casserole (or similar size) and
bake in the top third of a preheated 400-degree oven for 50 minutes or until
golden.  You may want to take a pastry brush and occasionally brush the top
of
the kugel with an fat or oil on the sides ofthe kugel during baking. Yield:
6-8
servings (M) with chicken fat, (P) with vegetable oil.
------------

Here's some guidance if you've written us with questions:

***Transcripts & Tapes***

Send $12.95 for tapes, $10.00 for transcripts to:
NPR TRANSCRIPTS & TAPES
635 Massachusetts Ave NW
Washington, DC 20001
(make checks payable to NPR)
For credit card orders, call NPR AUDIENCE SERVICES ON 202.414.3232


***Commentaries***

If you're a writer who would like to receive guidelines for submissions to
the 
program, send a self-addressed, stamped enveloped to:
Administrative Assistant
ALL THINGS CONSIDERED
635 Massachusetts Ave NW
Washington, DC 20001


***Music Requests*** 

If you would like more information on a piece of music you heard on the 
program, write with as much information as you can (date, time, story the
piece of music followed, even a brief description of the music) to this 
address <[a--c] at [npr.org]> but include the word DIRECTOR in the subject line.


***Reaching other NPR News programs***

[W--S--T] at [npr.org]     Weekend Edition on Saturday (with Scott Simon)
[W--S--N] at [npr.org]     Weekend Edition on Sunday (with Liane Hansen)
[T--N] at [npr.org]      Talk of the Nation (with Ray Suarez)
[S--iF--i] at [npr.org]    Talk of the Nation/Science Friday (with Ira Flatow)
[W--C] at [npr.org]      Weekend All Things Considered (with Daniel Zwerdling)
 
For a complete list of NPR e-mail address, write to: <[n p rlist] at [npr.org]>

Note:  Morning Edition (with Bob Edwards) does not have an e-mail address, 
yet.  E-mail to that program received here can NOT be forwarded, and will 
be ignored.  You can reach MEd. through the USPS.  
     NPR News
     635 Massachusetts Avenue NW
     Washington, DC 20001





Again, thanks for your interest in ALL THINGS CONSIDERED.

The ATC Staff

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 19 Apr 95 16:47:41 PST
From: [n--b--n] at [xpresso.seaslug.org] (Bill Vance)
To: [n--b--n] at [tomahawk.welch.jhu.edu]
Cc: [JERRYSYS 21] at [aol.com]
Subject: Re: Fwd: No Subject

In <[950419155416 88812547] at [aol.com]>, on Apr 19, [JERRYSYS 21] at [aol.com] wrote:

>Sorry for the unrelated bandwidth, but I thought somke of you might be
>interested to see the response from NPR to my email on the gun ban story.
> They narrowed right in on my area of concern, don't you think?
>
>Jerry Wootan
>---------------------
[Forwarded message: Deleted]

Right!  LETS BAN THOSE MOTHER STABBING, FATHER RAPING, CHILD MOLESTING,
DEADLY ASSAULT KUGELS!!!

--
An EFFECTIVE    +Want Clinton to arm +noban!xpresso!rkba (Bill Vance)
weapon in every +your Militia Unit?  [noban] at [xpresso.seaslug.org] Bothell, Wa.
hand = Freedom  +Change your name to +You listen when I xpresso,
on every side.  +"The Peoples Army". +I listen when uuxpresso....:-)

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 17:05:06 -0800 (PST)
From: [W--A--A] at [PLU.edu]
To: [N--B--N] at [tomahawk.welch.jhu.edu]
Subject: ATC

Here is what I sent ATC


I am displeased with your recent "All things considered" report on the repeal   
of the assault weapon ban.                                                      
                                                                                
Why is that an organization (yours) financed by tax dollars collected from      
Americans of all political parties, distorts the facts into compliance with the 
Democratic party's platform?                                                    
                                                                                
I am a 22 year old college student and a gun owner.  I believe that the gun and 
magazine ban is wrong because it denies Americans the freedom of choice based   
on soley cosmetic attributes.  So-called "assault weapons" function no          
differently than so-called "sporting weapons."  This is like saying a Cadillac  
with a hood ornament is illegal, but one without is fine.                       
The function is defined by the will of the user, not the object itself.         
                                                                                
I hope in the future you will offer equal time to the dissenting opinion.  Then 
truly, all things may actually be considered.                                   
                                                                                
                                                                                
James Wagar                                                                     
Pacific Lutheran University                                                     
Tacoma, WA                 
KPLU FM 88.8 is an NPR affiliate

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 02:00:13 -0400
From: [D J Schultz 1] at [aol.com]
To: [N--B--N] at [tomahawk.welch.jhu.edu]
Subject: Re: ATC's reply

Jerry posted:
>>Sorry for the unrelated bandwidth, but I thought somke of you might be
interested to see the response from NPR to my email on the gun ban story.
 They narrowed right in on my area of concern, don't you think?

Jerry Wootan
---------------------
Forwarded message:
From: [A--C] at [npr.org] (All Things Considered - NPR News)
To: [JERRYSYS 21] at [aol.com]
Date: 95-04-19 14:59:59 EDT

Thanks for your e-mail. We do read all correspondence, but the volume of mail

we receive makes this form letter necessary. Listen next Thursday, when we
read 
from letters to the program.  

<<

I got the same response, as I'm sure everyone else got.  Tax dollars at work!

------------------------------

Date: 19 Apr 95 22:04:03 -0600
From: [l--e--l] at [lever.ncdl.com] (L. Neil Smith)

To: [N--B--N] at [tomahawk.welch.jhu.edu]
Subject: INTERNET "DECENCY" BILL

 * Carbons Sent to: [t--om--s] at [solbrn.dseg.ti.com] at 1:306/131.0
                    [gr conf] at [mainstream.com] at 1:306/131.0
                    Lever Action BBS

 -=> Quoting [t--om--s] at [solbrn.dseg.ti.com] to L. Neil Smith <=-

 TH> Is there any way we can stop this bill, or is it a forgone
 TH> conclusion?

    Sorry to take so long getting back to you.  I'm about 200
messages behind.  To answer your question, I don't know.  I've
seen stuff about it on TV; reports say that the nerds and the
ACLU are up in arms.  The only lists I subscribe to relate to
Second Amendment issues, and they're preoccupied with Newtie's
wonderful Pre-Veto Hearings.

 TH> I am appalled at the complete lack of interest in this
 TH> issue. Nobody (except for you and me, apparently) seems to
 TH> care.

    Well, I'll carbon this to the lists with the following
observations:

    If I were a Democrat, and the internet had (A) been effective
in putting Republicans in the driver's seat in Congress and the
Senate, if it (B) threatened to change possession of the White
House, as well, and if it (C) seemed to be shaping up as the
medium through which an effective third party will finally come
to the fore and (D) every vestige of my own party's 60-year-old
socialist policies could be discredited and eradicated from
American history, I'd think it was a good idea for the government
-- preferably meaning my party -- to get the internet back under
control, wouldn't you?

    And what better way to chill free speech than through the
time-proven, "they can't possibly enforce this ridiculous law"
method of selective state terrorism we presently see employed by
the IRS, the BATF, and the DEA?

    And if, as usual, we could rely on plenty of help from the
short-sighted and feeble-minded opposition -- the tired old
outfit most likely to be replaced by that above-mentioned third
party -- so much the better.

    [Simulated Democrat mode toggled OFF]

    Thomas, this initial move to censor the internet is just as
clearly a threat to the Bill of Rights as the War on Drugs has
been. Trouble is, there are still some retards out there who have
to be convinced about the latter, and while we're doing that,
we're gonna be shut down by the former.

    Or we'll decide that both major parties want only to control
our lives and differ only in the perfunctory justifications they
offer for it -- and move to an established pro-liberty party
while we still can.

Later,
Neil




--- Blue Wave/RA v2.12 [NR]
--
|Internet: [l--e--l] at [lever.ncdl.com]
| From LEVER ACTION BBS  +1 970 493 6674 - Ft. Collins, CO
| Northern Colorado Data Link - Ft. Collins, CO (NCDL)

------------------------------

Date: 19 Apr 95 22:04:08 -0600
From: [l--e--l] at [lever.ncdl.com] (L. Neil Smith)
To: [N--B--N] at [tomahawk.welch.jhu.edu]
Subject: OKLAHOMA

=================================================================
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                       FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

               LIBERTARIAN SECOND AMENDMENT CAUCUS
                      ON OKLAHOMA EXPLOSION

     However tragic and reprehensible the disaster in Oklahoma
City today, it is obvious that the Clinton/Reno Administration
perceive it as a political opportunity, not only for the re-
election hopes of one of history's most discredited presidents,
but as a chance to transform their inherent inability to prevent
such disasters into another justification to increase the size,
power, and intrusiveness of government.

     Feeding upon human calamity this way is in the basic nature
of all governments, and constitutes one reason Libertarians wish
to see them stringently curtailed.  The mass media in particular
have a solemn responsibility -- and if they wish to restore their
own badly-damaged credibility, should make it their principal
business -- to ensure that the Clinton/Reno administration do not
profit from this tragedy.

     Although no indication exists yet as to the responsibility
for this violent act, one thing is certain:  it is a result, not
of insufficient government, but of too much.  If it is the work
of Moslem terrorists, for example, it would never have occurred
without unconstitutional United States interference in the Middle
East. If it is in retaliation for the state terrorism committed
two years ago in Waco, Texas, the same is true.

     These catastrophes never happened in America as long as the
government maintained at least a semblance of compliance with the
Constitution.  Today, a mere semblance of compliance is no longer
enough.  The only way to prevent such tragedies in the future is
to enforce the Bill of Rights.

     Americans should be reassured or advised -- whichever is
appropriate -- that any political advantage taken by the current
administration in this affair will be reversed by a future
Libertarian government, and those responsible for seizing upon
this excuse to weaken the Constitution further will be prosecuted
to the fullest extent allowed by the highest law of the land.

L. Neil Smith <[l--e--l] at [lever.ncdl.com]>
Author:   THE PROBABILITY BROACH, THE CRYSTAL EMPIRE,
THE LANDO CALRISSIAN ADVENTURES, HENRY MARTYN, and PALLAS
Editor:   LEVER ACTION BBS (303) 493-6674, FIDOnet: 1:306/56
Founder: Libertarian Second Amendment Caucus
Secretary & Legislative Director:
Weld County Fish & Wildlife Association
NRA Life Member

=============== PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE FREELY ===============



--- Blue Wave/RA v2.12 [NR]
--
|Internet: [l--e--l] at [lever.ncdl.com]
| From LEVER ACTION BBS  +1 970 493 6674 - Ft. Collins, CO
| Northern Colorado Data Link - Ft. Collins, CO (NCDL)

------------------------------

End of NOBAN-D Digest V95 Issue #51
***********************************