Does iPod exist for music, or does music exist for the iPod?
I’ve said for a long time that it doesn’t seem that music industry executives actually listen to music and that they want to charge consumers for every device that they use to listen to their music. Warner Music Group CEO Edgar Bronfman Jr. is now saying that music should cost different prices depending on what is being used to play the music.
Mr. Bronfman said the music industry should not have to use its content to promote the sale of digital music devices for Apple or anyone else, and not truly share in the profits.
“We are selling our songs through iPod, but we don’t have a share of iPod’s revenue,” he said. “We want to share in those revenue streams. We have to get out of the mindset that our content has promotional value only.”
So, for “the music industry”, music is merely a promotional item that sells cassette players, CD players, iPods, and other music devices. And so they want to “share in the profits” generated by those devices. Imagine:
“We are selling our songs through Pioneer CD Players, but we don’t have a share of Pioneer’s revenue. We want to share in those revenue streams. We have to get out of the mindset that our content has promotional value only.”
They have no idea that people who actually listen to music buy more music when it is easy for them to listen to it. That’s the whole secret to the success of the iTunes Music Store, in which the music industry does share profits. Music isn’t merely a promotional item for selling an iPod; an iPod--or any other music device--is a way of listening to enjoyable music. But someone who doesn’t listen to music wouldn’t understand that.
In response to Listening to music a privilege, not a right: Music executive comes out and says that listening to music on your computer is an extra privilege, and you should just buy a regular CD player.
- Bronfman Fires Back at Apple
- “The duet between Apple and the music industry struck a sour note as the industry takes aim at Steve Jobs.”
- Macrovision and RIAA hissy fit over pirates
- Music protection schemes rely on low product quality from major labels for success.
More content industry
- Apple’s new Music Store ringtone policy
- I had started to consider purchasing digital downloads instead of CDs, but because download restrictions change too easily CDs remain a far better choice for me.
- Rip, Mix, Pay
- Apple has saved me $400. I’ll be renewing my Sprint contract for a year when it expires next month.
- Apple asks music companies to drop digital restrictions
- “Imagine there’s no DRM, it isn’t hard to do.” Steve Jobs goes public saying that Apple prefers that there not be any artificial restrictions added to music that customers purchase.
- Apple encourages MP3 distribution?
- Apple’s steadfast refusal to either license their own digital restriction mechanism or program other restriction mechanisms into the iPod may be encouraging labels to switch to unrestricted sales.
- Google Video’s DRM is a disservice to Google’s users
- Google has a history of doing things right for their users even under pressure to restrict their users. Now that’s changing.
- Five more pages with the topic content industry, and other related pages