Brainwashing 101
I ran across a reference to Brainwashing 101 as “interesting” on the Volokh Conspiracy. This is a 46-minute preview of what may eventually become a feature-length documentary. The preview is grainy, but otherwise looks fine on my TV set; the graininess is more than offset by the fast download time--it took only about two minutes to download over my cable connection.
Remember that this is a preview and, judging from the cuts, probably hastily-made. So I’m not going to comment on that aspect of the documentary. I was, however, disappointed by the techniques that were used, and by the lack of anything in-depth about the issues displayed.
The first section is heavily influenced by Michael Moore, and that’s not a compliment. The voiceover adds meaning to the film that isn’t necessarily there; the stock footage of 9/11 adds meaning to the quotes that isn’t necessarily there.
The first “story”, after the opening montage celebrating 9/11, is about director Evan Coyne Maloney’s alma mater Bucknell University, and California Polytechnic. One student at Bucknell complained that they couldn’t take high-school-style overviews like “sociology” or “history”. Instead they had to take classes that have an actual topic. Why was that in there?
The Bucknell segments are all heavily edited and appear to be added more as flavor than anything else.
The most interesting part about the Cal Poly section is the victim saying, “I’ve never thought, this person doesn’t look like me, they’re automatically gonna hate me”. Well, you wouldn’t. But because you don’t have to consider this doesn’t mean that others don’t. Other students do have to worry about reactions based solely on what they look like. That you don’t recognize this is an indication that maybe the administration had a point.
This is one of the problems with this version, at least, of the documentary: it doesn’t appear that the interviewer and editors even recognize other points of view, let alone consider them. Because of this, their interviews have a tendency to undercut their points.
Of course, given the Moore-style editing, it is entirely possible that Steve Hinkle does recognize that other people do have to worry about being discriminated against, but was taken out of context. You just can’t know in a “documentary” like this. Fortunately, an interview with Foundation for Individual Rights in Education director Greg Lukianoff salvages this section. Lukianoff clearly and precisely describes the issues and the blundering and outrageous behavior of Cal Poly’s administration. This is by far the best part of these interviews. FIRE needs to make their own documentary.
When Hinkle contacted FIRE, FIRE brought the Center for Individual Rights and the American Civil Liberties Union on board and the University lost--
--on every single possible ground. Cal Poly was just a ridiculous case. They dummied up charges, they held a ridiculous hearing. They worked very hard to figure out something they could “get him on”. The administration wanted to send a message to all the students: “this could be you.” If every time you posted a flier you had to consider the risk of a seven-hour hearing, nobody would post fliers. There is something very worrisome about a university that would teach students that in a situation where someone is posting a flier you disagree with, you call the cops.
Afterwards, Maloney goes off on a Michael Moore-style montage of getting the police called on him in the University administration building. While on the one hand it was interesting how the school’s administration avoided answering the question, on the other hand I can’t really blame them for not wanting to talk to someone as unprofessional as this filmmaker appears to be.
That’s Brainwashing 101 in a nutshell: the issues are fascinating but poorly presented. Interviews are so heavily edited that the viewer can’t trust anything. The director is more interested in grabbing for gotchas than in exploring the issues. The best parts are third parties such as Greg Lukianoff. If you aren’t familiar with the issue of speech codes and speech suppression on college campuses, this one section would make a good download, but I would be very disappointed if I had paid money to see the rest of this documentary in a theater.
That’s sad, because this is an important issue. When a University committee members can make a threat to “shoot those ragheads right in the fucking face” after a Sikh student writes an article critical of the committee’s choices, there is a serious problem at that university. They’ve fostered an environment where the administration is more concerned with protecting turf than with addressing their students’ issues even in the face of clear threats not just to free speech but to individual students and religions.
When a student organization can be harassed as a racist by the university administration for hosting the black author of It’s OK to Leave the Plantation•, there is a serious problem at that university. FIRE chronicles hundreds of such cases throughout the United States, of an “increasingly repressive and partisan” educational environment. The loss of political diversity in our schools is becoming repression of political diversity.
Todd Zywicki, in Why Campus Intellectual Diversity Matters on the Volokh Conspiracy, writes:
One of our major goals as educators is to educate individuals who can participate in the governance of a free and democratic society. It is imperative that students be exposed to all viewpoints about the world and to learn to evaluate the truth and resonance of competing world views. It is a short road from the impoverished discussions in modern universities to the idiocy of Michael Moore and red v. blue America.
With its Moore-style editing and lack of honestly diverse viewpoints, Brainwashing 101 is as much a symptom of the impoverishment of modern higher education as the cases it cites. Those cases are important and if this is your only way of learning about them, go ahead and watch it. But you will probably find it more useful and more interesting to browse around the FIRE web site instead.
- Brainwashing 101
- “Brainwashing 101 is a provocative short film showing how universities use tools such as speech codes to force political views upon students.”
- The Truth about “Brainwashing 101”
- The Bucknell Caucus for Economic Justice writes a rebuttal of Brainwashing 101’s Bucknell segments.
- Why Campus Intellectual Diversity Matters
- “One of our major goals as educators is to educate individuals who can participate in the governance of a free and democratic society.”
- AcademicBias.com
- “Filmmakers Evan Coyne Maloney, Stuart E. Browning and Blaine Greenberg are currently producing a feature-length documentary film (scheduled for release in the fourth quarter of 2005) exploring political correctness on college campuses. As an interim offering, the filmmakers have produced a 46-minute documentary film: Brainwashing 101, which you can watch or download on this website.”
- Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
- “The mission of FIRE is to defend and sustain individual rights at America's increasingly repressive and partisan colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, legal equality, due process, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience--the essential qualities of individual liberty and dignity.”
- FIRE Spotlight: Use of Disruption Claim to Suppress Free Speech
- An overview of California Polytechnic State University’s harassment of College Republican Steve Hinkle.
- It’s OK to Leave the Plantation•
- Clarence Mason Weaver writes a book about social issues affecting all Americans: a growing dependency on federal funds and federal involvement in our daily lives.
- Clarence Mason Weaver
- “The Committee To Restore America was founded by individuals dedicated to restoring the great American principles that we all struggle to uphold. We feel it is our duty to stand for self determination and self respect and to find ways to celebrate the American culture. We believe in restoring individual pride and self worth through competition and fairness.”
- Center for Individual Rights
- “CIR specializes in a small number of areas of litigation: free speech and civil rights being the two most important. Concentration would enable CIR to provide timely, practical and knowledgeable representation to actual clients and to develop and implement a coherent, long-term litigation program in each of its areas.”
- American Civil Liberties Union
- They’ve been getting more shrill and less effective as they succumb to BDS, but they’re still probably the best place to go for civil liberties info.
- Volokh Conspiracy
- A collection of lawyers commenting on legal issues from a scholarly perspective, and sometimes while arguing major cases in the courts.
More civil rights
- The presumption of innocence and prisoners of war
- Fairness means raising the standards of others, not lowering our own.
- The Second Sex
- According to Simone de Beauvoir, woman is the “other” not only to men but also often to herself, an alien thing that is not quite human and is never sure what it is or what its place is.
- Shopping around for lesser civil rights
- The two reasons for “rendition” are that we don’t have evidence against a suspect, or that we want to keep it secret. When are those reasons valid?
- Always Trust a Criminal
- Franklin said that those who give up freedom for a bit of temporary safety will lose both. But we now know that restoring freedom can give us true safety.
- To Kill a Mockingbird
- I don’t think you can fully enjoy any Southern civil rights work without having read “To Kill a Mockingbird.” All such works are written in the shadow of Harper Lee.
- Eight more pages with the topic civil rights, and other related pages
More deception
- There will be deception
- As their world falls apart, media liars will get better at lying.
- The coming crisis
- We know it. We just don’t know what it is yet.
- Media misdirection
- What does it matter when major news organizations try to rewrite history through omission and misdirection?
- Obama campaign skirts campaign finance law
- I expected the New York Times to be silent on the illegal donations that the Obama 2008 campaign encourages. I should have known better: they’re trying to cover for the campaign. But the bigger issue is that laws that don’t get enforced are counterproductive; they encourage dishonesty and lawlessness.
- The Helter Skelter Media
- Joe the Plumber and the vengeance of the media.
- 19 more pages with the topic deception, and other related pages
More education
- Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass, an American slave
- Not only does slavery make life worse for slaves, it doesn’t make life better for slave-owners. And the ultimate freedom is freedom to learn.
- Teaching kids to fail
- Are schools designed to teach kids to fail?
- ACLU enables Texas textbook takeover
- If you give the government a gun, some politician or bureaucrat somewhere is going to pull the trigger. Make sure that whatever powers you cede to the government are powers you want them to exercise.
- Blogs fight resegregation in DC?
- Can bloggers resurrect a successful education program that beltway Democrats killed?
- Government food courts
- Imagine there’s no grocery… it isn’t hard to do… nothing to grill or fry for…… and no bacon too…
- 10 more pages with the topic education, and other related pages
More unreasoning partisanship
- The ruling class’s unexpectedly old clothes
- I recently ran across early use of “unexpectedly” for a conservative’s strong economy, referring to the early 1981 market recovery under President Reagan.
- Why do gun owners think the left wants to take our guns?
- Gun owners think the left wants to take away guns because the left keeps refusing commonsense gun laws in favor of laws that ban guns.
- Corpseman resurrected: correcting Betsy DeVos
- The left has once again decided that the way those people speak is ignorant, and that those people are too stupid to hold public office.
- Why is the country so divided?
- Because you keep trying to tell everyone else what to do.
- Divisive double standards
- It’s a hypocritical form of divisiveness, calling for togetherness and reason whenever your side commits a crime, and engaging in unreasoning partisanship when you can find some way to pin it on others.
- 32 more pages with the topic unreasoning partisanship, and other related pages
“It is bizarre that there are people out there who call themselves liberal who believe in crushing speech that they don’t like.”--Greg Lukianoff