Democrat Chris Murphy: Obamacare is “the end of health care”
Senator Chris Murphy is angry at President Trump, because Trump has “threatened” to enforce the law as written. The law in question is the misnamed Affordable Care Act, which, when congress passed it, required members of congress and their staff to live under its rules as well and pay for their own plans. But because it turned out the Affordable Care Act is actually Unaffordable, President Obama’s administration exempted them from that law, in a very convoluted manner that makes even less sense than the law itself and is almost certainly in itself illegal, not just unethical.
President Trump has threatened to revoke that exemption. Senator Murphy doesn’t want that. If President Trump requires congressional offices to live under the health care law that congress requires us to live under, Murphy says, that will “cut off health care”. It will “end health care”.
This is a clear threat to Congress: pass my health bill or as punishment I will end health care for you, your staff, & your constituents. Trump isn’t saying these things will happen naturally. He has the power to cut off health care for leg branch employees & crater exchanges.
That’s right. Democrats know what Obamacare’s effects are. They know that the ACA is really the Unaffordable Care Act. Just like its conservative critics predicted it would be, that it was for all practical purposes designed to be unaffordable.
And if they have to live under it the same way we do, it’s the same thing as ending health care, it’s as if Trump “cut off health care” for them.
He doesn’t seem to realize that this means that health care has already been cut off and ended for those of us who do not receive the special subsidies congress gets.1
The way the ACA originally applied to congress is that they were eligible only for the same subsidies anyone else using Obamacare would be eligible for. But most congressional staffers make more than $30,000 a year, some significantly more than that. That’s right about where ACA subsidies ended for individuals, at the time.
That’s also right about where the average personal income lands, too. And it turns out that the cost of health care plans under the ACA are pretty onerous when you’re only making $30,000 a year.
You would think this would be a clue: the ACA raised the cost of health care plans so drastically that the average American was going to have trouble paying it. Perhaps we should repeal the ACA and start over with something new that doesn’t hurt people so much.
But if you thought that way, you’d not be the average congressperson. In the mind of representatives like Senator Murphy, the ACA was just fine for other people, it just needed to be fixed for congress.
So what they apparently did was pretend to be a small business, so as to get federal subsidies from the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program, of 72% of premiums. The Obama administration’s Office of Personnel Management said, sure, you can do that. This is crazy, because:
- Congress is not a business. When they sell influence, they don’t usually put it on the books.
- Congress is not small. In order to be a small business, a business had to have fewer than 50 employees. In their paperwork, they attested that the Senate and the House each employs only 45 people2.
- The OPM doesn’t have any regulatory authority under the ACA. They’re not legally entitled to approve a scheme like this even if the scheme itself was legal. The OPM knew this—but changed their mind once President Obama intervened.
- The FEHBP isn’t legally allowed to subsidize premiums outside of the FEHBP.
If I were subsidized to the tune of 72% of premium costs, up to $12,000 a year, I’d probably choose a gold plan like congress does, and be okay with Obamacare just as they are.3 A 72% discount would bring Obamacare premiums back in line with what I was paying before the ACA made real health insurance illegal.
Think about that. Senator Chris Murphy knows that Obamacare is too expensive for people with even an above average income to afford. He knows that because he and his staff make above average incomes and can’t afford it. Instead of voting to fix that, he voted to keep it. And now complains that President Trump is going to “cut off” and “end” his health care… by making him follow the same laws he wants everybody else required to use Obamacare to follow.
In response to Why we must not ration health care: Rationing health care means fewer cures.
He also seems to be trying to pad the narrative, and blame the already existing cratering of the exchanges on a Trump action that hasn’t happened yet: ending insurance company bailouts. But it’s even worse: the insurance company bailouts Trump is talking about ending really are bailouts: they were not part of the law and have been specifically forbidden by congress.
Democrats claimed that the ACA would force economies of scale on insurance companies to reduce costs and improve service. There was no way it could do that, but they are making it even worse: by bailing out insurance companies when they fail to convince people to buy insurance, Democrats are guaranteeing poor service, higher costs, and administrative bloat.
↑You might think that the FEHPB computers would recognize that, hey, their account says they only have 45 employees, yet I’m giving them far more than 45 subsidies!
It’s not the FEHPB’s money. It’s your money. Why should they care if they’re giving away too much of it?
↑Note: sarcasm. Obamacare is a mess no matter who pays for it. They very idea that we would need a 72% subsidy merely to bring health plan costs down to their pre-2014 levels would have been called partisan fearmongering before the ACA went into effect.
↑
- Maybe Sen. Chris Murphy is mad because he assumed if he liked his taxpayer subsidized plan he could keep it?: Greg Pollowitz at Twitchy
- “The ‘threat’ he’s referring to is this tweet from President Donald Trump saying he will take away ‘very soon’ Congress’ subsidy that allows members and their staff to buy Obamacare on the cheap… The Washington Post reported that the current taxpayer subsidy covers 72% of these premiums…”
- Congress Receiving Unconstitutional Obamacare Subsidies: Robert E. Moffit at The Heritage Foundation
- “Members of Congress probably didn’t know what they were doing. After the horror of it all sunk in, meeting behind closed doors, they quickly launched a three-year search for various ways to escape the mess they had created for themselves.”
- Democrat Freaks Out After Trump Threatens to Take Away Congress’s Special Obamacare ‘Carve-Out’: Jason Howerton
- “President Donald Trump on Saturday threatened to end ‘bailouts’ for members of Congress and insurance companies if lawmakers don’t pass a new health care bill in the near future. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) said Trump’s warning is a “clear threat” to take away health care from members of Congress and their staff.”
- Economies of scale and government-run health care
- Economies of scale only produce lower prices when people are allowed a choice of service providers—including the choice to forego the service. Government-run programs do not benefit from economies of scale—in fact, scaling up will cause increased prices when the industry is run by the government.
- How Congress Mysteriously Became a ‘Small Business’ to Qualify for Obamacare Subsidies: Robert E. Moffit at The Daily Signal
- “But, at a July 31 closed-door meeting with Senate Democrats, President Barack Obama had promised he would ‘fix’ the mess they made of their health coverage. So, on Aug. 7, 2013, just as Congress was getting out of town for the August recess, the Office of Personnel Management ruled that members of Congress and staff enrolled in the exchange program would get Federal Employees Health Benefits Program subsidies, even though they were no longer in the program.”
- On ObamaCare, is there one set of rules for Congress and another for citizens?: John Malcolm and Michael F. Cannon at The Hill
- “Members of Congress, congressional staff, and their dependents are now in their third year of receiving health coverage through the Exchange the District of Columbia established for small businesses under the Affordable Care Act. Newly discovered documents illustrate how government officials broke numerous laws to make that happen—laws that apply to you and me, but apparently not to Congress.” (Hat tip to Michael F. Cannon at Congress Is Getting A Special Exemption From ObamaCare—And No, It’s Not Legal)
- Ron DeSantis: Congress will kill Obamacare if Trump kills lawmakers' subsidies: Pete Kasperowicz at Washington Examiner
- “If ObamaCare is hurting people, & it is, why shouldn’t it hurt the insurance companies & why should Congress not be paying what public pays?” he asked. (Hat tip to Lawrence Richard at Sarah Palin)
- What Members Of Congress Pay Their Employees May Surprise You: Kiran Dhillon
- “A glance at the numbers above shows that salaries for congressional staffers are not always in the common $30,000 to $50,000 range. The member with the highest average salary for his employees, Rep. Rob Bishop, pays his staff an average of $81,000.”
More Congress
- Who creates more jobs, Democrats or Republicans?
- More jobs are created under gridlock than under unified governments. However, this only applies if Republicans hold at least one of the House or Senate.
More hypocrisy
- Minnesota Representative: Stop White Hate
- In the wake of anti-white violence by a Muslim shooter in Denver, Representative Ilhan Omar begins campaign to “stand together to stop white hate.”
- Divisive double standards
- It’s a hypocritical form of divisiveness, calling for togetherness and reason whenever your side commits a crime, and engaging in unreasoning partisanship when you can find some way to pin it on others.
- Let those who are without sin share the first post
- A Muslim flight attendant refuses to serve drinks out of religious conviction. Would it be right for her employers to start a social media campaign publicizing her past drinking?
More ObamaCare
- Community health acts to improve Obamacare
- Democrats now want to talk about how to improve Obamacare. Here’s how to do it.
- Health insurance reform? What health insurance reform?
- The Truth About Republicans: they don’t want to repeal Obamacare.
- Economies of scale and government-run health care
- Economies of scale only produce lower prices when people are allowed a choice of service providers—including the choice to forego the service. Government-run programs do not benefit from economies of scale—in fact, scaling up will cause increased prices when the industry is run by the government.
- A tale of two negotiators
- If you want to see how Republicans in Congress fail to pass successful reforms, compare the House Obamacare “repeal” with the White House’s budget.
- Election lessons: Obamacare and how compromise works
- As Republicans work into 2017, they need to learn how negotiations and compromise work. President Trump may not be the best teacher, but he at least understands how to negotiate.
- 16 more pages with the topic ObamaCare, and other related pages
More President Donald Trump
- Trump, tariffs, and the war on American workers
- Why do so many American workers support Trump so strongly against the wishes of their union leadership? Partly because only Trump recognizes that we’re in a war targeting American workers.
- Walk toward the fire
- Trump reassures crowd after assassination attempt fails.
- Trump and the January 6 defendants
- There appears to be a concerted effort on conservative forums to blame Trump for not doing anything for the January 6 prisoners and defendants. Is it true?
- Betrayal is bad advice
- It makes sense that the beltway would want to depress voter turnout by working class voters. It’s a mistake for Trump supporters to do so.
- Who is Trump running against?
- If Trump runs against Biden, he’ll lose, just like he did in 2020: by getting more votes but fewer ballots. It looks like Trump understands that. He’s not running against Biden. He’s running against the Democrats and Republicans who put Biden in power.
- 30 more pages with the topic President Donald Trump, and other related pages