Sarah Palin’s Gordian Knot: Slicing crony capitalism
Sarah Palin wants to cut the knot tying big businesses to big government. The way she wants to do this: remove, not reduce, the corporate income tax. To hear this from a potentially major candidate is huge, especially in the context in which it’s most important, which is crony capitalism. The corporate income tax is probably the Gordian knot of crony capitalism. Federal officials use it to extort support, and major corporations use the lobbyists that they must hire to deal with the tax, to lobby for other federal givebacks in exchange for even more support for politicians. It’s a huge vicious circle that benefits larger businesses over smaller businesses who can’t afford teams of federal lobbyists.
There’s a huge difference between lowering the corporate income tax and getting rid of it entirely: as long as it still exists, businesses have to hire experts in government bureaucracy in order to deal with it; they have to hire experts in government lobbying in order to make sure the onus of the tax applies to their competitors rather than them. They have to maintain a line to federal politicians. Take the tax away entirely, and they no longer have to do any of that.
That line goes two ways. Through manipulation of the corporate tax code, politicians can convince businesses to do things the business would never consider doing without the tax break—all without the politician passing any controversial anti-privacy law. Take away the tax, and congress can no longer offer a tax break for supporting more surreptitious surveillance or instituting drug testing on employees.
A lowered tax still allows politicians to benefit from crony capitalism. We can’t end corporate welfare without ending the incentive for big businesses to lobby for it.
Another fundamental she mentions is that government cannot create jobs. Only the private sector can. Every job “created” by the government needs to be paid for by taxes on private sector employees.
“We need sudden and relentless reform… this requires deeds, not just words. The way forward is no more politics as usual… Right now, we have the highest federal corporate tax rate in the industrialized world… this doesn’t generate as much money as you would think, though, because many big corporations, they skirt federal taxes, because they have the friends in DC who write the rules for the rest of us. This makes us less competitive and restrains the engine of prosperity. Heck, some businesses, they spend more time trying to figure out how to hide their profits than they do in generating more profits so that they can expand and hire more of us.
So to make America the most attractive and competitive place to do business, to set up shop here, and hire people here, to attract capital from all over the globe that will lead to an explosion of growth, instead of chasing industry off-shore, I propose to eliminate all federal corporate income tax. And hear me out on this. This is how we create millions of high-paying jobs. This is how we increase opportunity and prosperity for all. But here’s the best part: to balance out the loss of any federal revenue from this tax cut, we eliminate corporate welfare and all the loopholes. We eliminate bailouts.
This is how we break the back of crony capitalism, because it feeds off corporate welfare, which is just socialism for the very rich. We can change all that. The message, then, to job-creating corporations is, yeah, we’ll unshackle you from the world’s highest federal taxes, but you will stand, or fall, on your own. Just like all the rest of us out on Main Street.
See, when we empower the job creators our economy will soar. Americans will get back to work. This plan is a first step in a long march toward fundamental restoration of a strong and free-market economy, and it represents the kind of real reform that we need. And folks, it must come from you. It must come from the American people. Real hope is in you.
…
Real hope isn’t in an individual. It’s not in a politician, certainly… don’t wait for the permanent political class to reform anything for you. They won’t. They can’t. They can’t even take responsibility for their own actions.
That’s from about 30:00 in the video, but you should watch the whole thing. This is the voice of a true reformer.
Update: added a link to a transcript of the speech and to John Nolte’s commentary.
In response to What is the purpose of a politician?: Is the purpose of a politician to hold political office? Or is the purpose of a politician to do right by their constituents?
- Complete Video and Media Roundup From Indianola: Doug Brady at Conservatives 4 Palin
- “Here are a few early reports coming out of Iowa.”
- Governor Palin's Speech at the "Restoring America" Tea Party of America Rally in Indianola, Iowa: Sarah Palin at SarahPAC
- “We sent a new class of leaders to D.C., but immediately the permanent political class tried to co-opt them—because the reality is we are governed by a permanent political class, until we change that. They talk endlessly about cutting government spending, and yet they keep spending more. They talk about massive unsustainable debt, and yet they keep incurring more. They spend, they print, they borrow, they spend more, and then they stick us with the bill. Then they pat their own backs, and they claim that they faced and ‘solved’ the debt crisis that they got us in, but when we were humiliated in front of the world with our country’s first credit downgrade, they promptly went on vacation.”
- Miner Drug Testing Bill Passes House Committee: Union, Coal Association Supports Legislation: Owen Covington
- “New coal miners would face alcohol and drug tests, and coal companies would receive tax incentives for instituting drug testing programs for miners under a House bill passed by committee Tuesday.”
- Root Causes: In Iowa, Sarah Palin Lays Out a Governing Philosophy that Should Worry Both Sides: John Nolte at Big Government
- “Today in Iowa, home of that all-important Caucus (hint-hint?), Governor Palin spoke as clearly as she ever has on a subject near and dear to my heart and one I’ve been waiting to hear from a serious GOP contender. Palin calls it, quite appropriately, ‘crony capitalism,’ where the moneyed and powerful receive preferential treatment from our political class in exchange for the financial support that puts and keeps the political class in charge of the rest of us. This is the vicious circle currently tanking our economy and Palin’s own words sum it up best.”
- “Leiby’s Initiative’: Lawmakers To Propose $500 Tax Credit For Surveillance Camera Installation
- “Assemblyman Hikind (D-Brooklyn), Assemblyman Peter Abbate (D-Brooklyn), and State Sen. Diane Savino (D-Brooklyn/Staten Island) will introduce a bill called ‘Leiby’s Initiative,’ which would give a $500 annual tax credit to any New York City property owner who installs and maintains surveillance cameras on their property.”
More corporate cronyism
- Business prospect incentives discourage innovation
- Complicating the law and raising taxes, then lowering them for businesses that know how to lobby local or state governments, is not a recipe for encouraging innovation. It is a recipe for killing it.
- Atlas Shrugged II: The Strike
- I just saw the second part of the Atlas Shrugged trilogy. It is amazing.
- Crony vs. Crony
- The voters will look up and shout “save us!” History will look down, and whisper “no”.
- Why is the media saying Sanders lost the debate?
- Bernie Sanders spoke an important and inconvenient truth about socialism when he came to Hillary Clinton’s defense at the debates.
- The Parable of the Primary
- If Republicans are looking to be more Obama than Obama, they couldn’t have found a better cronyist than Donald Trump.
- 15 more pages with the topic corporate cronyism, and other related pages
More Sarah Palin
- Sarah
- Published while Governor Sarah Palin was just Governor Sarah Palin and not the 2008 Vice Presidential nominee for the Republican Party, this is a fascinating look at the pre-media frenzy governor.
- The anti-politician
- In 2007, then-governor Sarah Palin turned down federal funds for a pointless Alaskan roads project in hopes that the money could be put to better use by another state, Minnesota, that had just seen a tragic bridge collapse during rush hour.
- Nothing to fear but a brokered convention
- The reason someone smart would want a brokered convention is that it’s exciting, and it means media coverage, and even more, it means unfiltered media coverage.
- President Obama pokes the bear
- Sometimes you eat the bear; sometimes the bear eats you. Why is President Obama running against his 2008 opponent’s vice-presidential candidate? Why is he lying about her? And why doesn’t he want to discuss real issues?
- Who is the fiscally-sane candidate?
- Which of the Republican candidates is most likely to help turn this country back on the path of fiscal sanity?
- 19 more pages with the topic Sarah Palin, and other related pages
Wait, wait, wait.
Are you saying that if we don't tax corporations they will no longer line up at the government teat for more? Really? They won't hire lobbyists to have the government give them stuff once they're not liable for taxes? They won't continue to write legislation that gets rubber-stamped by lazy lawmakers?
Poppycock, I say. As long as the government controls money, corporations will do their damnedest to get that money. Your argument here is that we should suspend the tax because there are too many loopholes, which render the tax ineffective. Here's a crazy idea: remove the loopholes.
Fundamentally the problem is that in the US we have hopelessly entangled revenue collection (taxation) with policy. By mixing policy into the tax code, we have created a nightmare of credits and deductions that favors those who can afford accountants. Yet another way to make being poor expensive.
It doesn't help that my government has been willing to sell my mineral resources (I'm a part owner of all public land) for a fraction of its value. They're taking out loan after loan in my name and at the same time giving away my assets for practically free.
If Sarah takes a stand against that, if she says "that's MY oil up there in ANWAR, and I'm not going to give it to you just to refine it and sell it back to me," then she will have my attention. No more letting timber companies choose the price for forests. No more practically free gold mines to people named 'Bush'. No environmental straw dog, just getting value for what we already own.
Only trouble is, Sarah's backers would hate that.
The other way she can get me behind her: Publicly challenge the constitutional rape that is the National Security Letter. If she wants me to believe that she's on my side, that's all she has to do. Protect my property, and protect my rights. Not taxing corporations won't prevent the government from giving them my stuff for free.
The other Jerry at 6:01 a.m. September 4th, 2011
XZXfM
I realize on review that part of my screed above actually echoes Ms. Palin's proposal. Sometimes I just get rolling. But the problem is the loopholes, not the tax. It's the use of tax code to enact policy decisions that creates the swamp that corporations delight in. Not taxing corporations will not fix the problem of loopholes, nor will it do anything about money politics. To fix loopholes, you have to actually close the loopholes.
The other Jerry at 6:10 a.m. September 4th, 2011
XZXfM
If the tax code is what creates the swamp, and we simply remove the tax code, there is nothing to have loopholes in. Those “loopholes” weren’t, for the most part, accidental. Expecting the same people who made them to close them without creating more than they close is expecting the impossible. You want to deal with the symptom without dealing with the root cause. If there is a market in loopholes and organizations with enough money to engage that market, that market will be met.
capvideo at 8:05 p.m. September 4th, 2011
tVAhq
The thing to remember is that loopholes are implementation of policy. If you say "no more loopholes" you're saying "no more mixing policy and revenue collection". While I would love to see that happen, the result will be that policy that is currently implemented through tax breaks will be implemented through spending instead, and those same corporations currently taking advantage of the loopholes will be getting handouts instead. Ending corporate income tax will not end corporate greed.
The other Jerry at 11:37 p.m. September 4th, 2011
XZXfM
You really think politicians are going to go from hiding handouts in tax policy, to passing actual, standalone handouts? Even after the drubbing they took in 2010 for doing that for the banks? I don’t see that happening even if businesses ask for it. But second, the reason businesses ask for it today is that businesses must pay for lobbyists who are experts in federal money policy to keep their competitors from using the tax law to gain an advantage. Since they must have those money-savvy lobbyists anyway, they also use them for other money-oriented lobbying. Take away the absolute requirement for money-lobbyists, and more businesses will forego lobbying for money, choosing instead to put the wages and donations they would have put into lobbying, into making a better business.
capvideo at 12:56 a.m. September 5th, 2011
tVAhq
Oh, and you should read up on Palin’s actions as governor vis-a-vis the oil companies. Her backers better not hate that—it’s what she did when she forced the oil companies to renegotiate their contracts.
capvideo at 12:58 a.m. September 5th, 2011
tVAhq