The traffic ticket lottery
Governments are in the business of collecting fees and taxes. They are not in the business of making roads safer. If we turn safety violations into a fee for the government to collect, then government will ensure that there are more safety violations. Because government is in the business of collecting more fees.
California is proposing adding speed cameras specifically to generate $398 million dollars in revenue. Not for safety. Because California needs more money. San Diego already has a history of speed cameras: they specifically design intersections and yellow times to create more dangerous intersections in order to generate more revenue.
The reason to pass these laws must be turned back to safety and away from revenue. And as long as a government makes more money off of more violations, the laws will be about revenue and not safety.
On the other hand, we are not yet at a point where we want to put drivers in jail for running a yellow light that just turned red.1 Nor are we willing to put drivers in jail for going 85 in a 65 mph zone. We’d have to build a cell for every driver on the 5 if we did that.
I propose that if (a) fines are better than jailtime, and we know that (b) fines that go to the state cause the state to create unsafe roads, then we should put the fines into a pool that does not go to any purpose that might offset budget shortfalls.
There is a way to collect fines without having the fines go to the state. We can combine two of the most popular, counter-productive programs we have into one super-popular, productive program:
Pool traffic fines into a lottery. In January, or perhaps January and July, draw ten lucky winners taken randomly from the list of whoever voted in the last election; they each win one tenth of the takings for the last six months or one year. The winnings are tax-free, so that the state doesn’t see any of that money. The sole reason for giving out these tickets—and for passing the laws enabling them in the first place—must be safety, and not revenue.
All fines, not just traffic fines, should be treated this way. Otherwise we’re creating a perverse incentive for municipalities and states to encourage unsafe activities; to lower yellow light times below a safe level; to drop speed limits below a safe level; and to pass laws that create unsafe traffic waves.
We might be willing to put drivers in jail for running a red light that’s long been red, but those are even more rare than mistiming a yellow.
↑
- Government-run insurance
- Government organizations don’t have any incentive to sell you shit. Their goal is to tax you. Providing services or products is only an excuse to tax.
- Money more important than safe intersections
- When cities make money when laws are broken, they’ll ensure that those laws are broken more often. With red light cameras, this means shortening yellow times to unsafe levels.
- Schwarzenegger Pushes Speed Cameras In California Budget
- “California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, desperately seeking new sources of revenue to cover a $19.9 billion budget shortfall, yesterday declared a state of fiscal emergency. As part of his proposed solution, Schwarzenegger called for the deployment of a massive statewide speed camera program to generate at least $397.5 million in net profit to state and local government.”
- Speeding, Parking Tickets on Rise as Government Revenue Source: Joshua Rhett Miller
- “According to a study in this month’s Journal of Law and Economics, local governments like Malden use traffic citations to bridge budget shortfalls. Researchers Thomas Garrett and Gary Wagner examined revenue and traffic citation data from 1990 to 2003 in 96 counties in North Carolina, and they discovered that the number of citations issued increases in years that follow a drop in revenue.”
More red light cameras
- Round Rock vote to terminate Redflex contract
- Round Rock will, this coming Thursday, consider a resolution to terminate their contract with Redflex for red light cameras. I think that’s a great idea.
- Turning crime into a profit center
- Asset forfeiture and traffic laws have one dangerous thing in common: they turn danger into a profit center for government.
- Money more important than safe intersections
- When cities make money when laws are broken, they’ll ensure that those laws are broken more often. With red light cameras, this means shortening yellow times to unsafe levels.
- Red light cameras increase accident rates
- Yet another study showing that red light cameras increase, rather than decrease the danger at intersections.