Texas open carry Senate hearing
I recently read P.J. O’Rourke’s Parliament of Whores, and in it he makes the point that we rarely thank our elected officials for what is in fact an often thankless job.
I just listened to a public hearing of the Texas Senate’s Agriculture, Rural Affairs & Homeland Security Committee. The hearing began at 9 AM. I woke up about 11:30 AM and started listening at about noon after leisurely making breakfast. The hearing continued until 5:36 PM. Most of the legislators appear1 to have left by 3 or so, but the chairman, Senator Craig Estes, remained to the end.
So, Senator Craig Estes, thank you very much. You did a great job.
There were three purposes of today’s hearing, which is probably why it went so long. The third (Interim Charge 5), and why I was interested, was
Study and make recommendations on removing barriers to Second Amendment Rights, including but not limited to open carry legislation. Consider other state laws related to open carry.
Open carry, believe it or not, is illegal in Texas. Despite our reputation, we’re one of only six states that has no open carry.2
Most of the people at the hearing were in favor of joining the majority of states that allow open carry. Some of the Senators are still arguing the last war: they’re using the same arguments used against concealed carry, that it’s going to result in more arguments escalating to murder, that people are not going to be able to trust their neighbor if they think their neighbor might be carrying, and what will the children think?
All of the failed arguments against concealed carry, without regard to the fact that none of these things happen in other states that allow concealed—or open—carry.
Some of the smarter anti-carry organizations realized that they had to find some way to invoke a difference between open carry and concealed carry, and a woman, Julie, from the University of Texas at Dallas, had an innovative approach: triggers. “Triggers” have been in the news lately due to someone saying that pro-life posters “triggered” her and she couldn’t control her vandalism after being triggered.3
Julie argues against open carry because it might be a trigger: according to her, 8% to 9% of the United States has some form of violence-induced Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome. That is, almost 10% of the population might be set off just by seeing a firearm! And if it’s military PTSD, it could even cause more violence! Thus, even though concealed carry did not result in a bloodbath as was predicted by opponents, open carry still can.
If one out of eleven people were triggered just by seeing an armed police officer, or any of the DPS troopers providing security for the capitol, this wouldn’t need to be a theory. We’d be seeing the results daily, and it wouldn’t be pretty. Four out of every hundred people would be cowering and sobbing every time a law enforcement agent walked by, and another four out of every hundred would go into a killing frenzy. It would be a pitiable bloodbath. And I can’t imagine what’s going on in the forty-four states that allow open carry.
And, finally, she added, if open carry is enacted, people with PTSD might start avoiding Texas, hurting our economy. That one I can understand: it explains a lot if everyone who is stressed out by firearms is concentrated in places like Washington, DC.
And Austin.
One of the more interesting arguments in favor of open carry came from women at the hearing: they would like to be able to carry even when they’re wearing clothing that can’t fully conceal a handgun. Men will wear anything, but most women’s clothing isn’t designed to conceal bulky objects.
I didn’t want to have to limit my clothes shopping to only clothing that could carry concealed.
There was at least one police officer there arguing in favor of open carry. He said that, in his experience, openly carrying is definitely a deterrent to crime. When asked whether it might not be the badge that was the real deterrent in his case, he countered that he once tried flashing his badge without having a gun, and it was “the worst thing I ever did.”4
He added that “I would carry a gun without a badge but I will never carry a badge without a gun ever again.”
In response to Texas 2014: News and Stuff about Texas and the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Area in 2014.
I say “appear”, but really it’s “sounds like”. I lost video around 1 PM and had only audio afterward.
↑This of course depends on how “open carry” is defined, however, the other states that don’t allow open carry are California, Florida, South Carolina, Illinois, and New York. And, of course, Washington DC doesn’t allow it either.
↑You can find Julie’s testimony starting at 7:03 in the video. She identified herself as “a Ph.d candidate at the University of Texas at Dallas. Part of my research deals with the healing of the psychological trauma of war, but I should disclose that I am not an expert in psychology.”
This is most likely Julie Gavran. She identified herself as a Ph.d. student who is not in the field of Psychology; if this is the same person, she “is a PhD candidate in the School of Arts and Humanities at the University of Texas at Dallas where she is researching the life and work of Benton MacKaye, the founder of the Appalachian Trail.”, which is in fact “not psychology”.
She is also the social media coordinator for the anti-self defense organization Students for Gun-Free Schools as well as the regional coordinator for the Campaign to Keep Guns Off Campus. She didn’t identify herself as either of those, either.
↑This was Colin Owen, Chief of Police for Milano. You can see his testimony at 7:46 PM.
↑
- Open carry maps
- Several maps showing the state of open carry laws in the United States.
- Parliament of Whores
- Parliament of Whores is perhaps the best introduction to Washington, DC politics that I’ve seen. And it’s funny as hell to boot.
- Senator Craig Estes for Texas
- The central web site for Senator Craig Estes; from here you can get to his Facebook posts, his blog, and his tweets.
- Texas State Senate video archives
- “Archived audio and video recordings of Senate Chamber proceedings, Senate Committee hearings, and other archived events…” The video you’re looking for is from 4/7/14, from the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Rural Affairs & Homeland Security.
More Texas
- Texas 2023 legislative priorities
- The Texas legislature is in session now for 2023; other than special sessions, it won’t meet again until 2025. Everyone has their priorities. Here are mine.
- Every state should plan to secede
- A state cannot secede without a plan for handling the duties of the federal government. It’s the same stuff a state would need a plan for if the federal government becomes temporarily unable or unwilling to perform its duties.
- November 2021 Texas propositions
- There are several proposed amendments to the Texas constitution on the ballot November 2. Here are some quick summaries of what they mean.
- Origin vs. Destination sales taxes: where should Internet taxes go?
- In the midst of one of the worst disasters for small businesses in my lifetime, the Texas Comptroller wants to make life even more difficult for them.
- California never had a free market power failure
- California’s experiment in free market power generation has become mythological in how it is remembered. The left is desperate to tar it as a free market failure. But California’s experiment wasn’t free market. It was a massive government-managed exchange practically designed to cause high prices.
- Six more pages with the topic Texas, and other related pages
April 8: Updated names now that the video is available online.