Federal government bars discussing issues
Jonathan Rauch describes some of the issues that have come before the FEC regarding the McCain-Feingold censorship law.
Now it is official: The United States of America has a federal bureaucracy in charge of deciding who can say what about politicians during campaign season. We can argue, and people do, about whether this state of affairs is good or bad, better or worse than some alternative. What is inarguable is that America now has what amounts to a federal speech code, enforced with jail terms of up to five years.
The law does exactly what its critics predicted: it treats the ACLU, grass-roots voter organizations, and major corporations exactly the same. They can’t talk about candidates before an election.
As a result, Wisconsin voters cannot take to the airwaves and inform other voters about bills before the Wisconsin legislature. The ACLU cannot challenge President Bush on his support of civil liberties violations in the war on terror. And the Supreme Court has approved all of these free speech restrictions.
- Fix The McCain-Feingold Law. Oops--Can I Say That?
- Jonathan Rauch says, “one election with a speech code is more than enough.”
- Voter marginalization bill passes House
- Bipartisan support pushes breakthrough bill into Senate hands. Supporters on both sides praise separating voters from the political process.
More McCain-Feingold
- Citizens United and libertarian schizophrenia
- The latest Supreme Court ruling on free speech pretty much completes my renunciation of the Democratic Party.