How to counter Trump’s immigration policy
Several weeks ago, before the San Bernardino murders and Donald Trump’s response to them, I wrote that “Americans don’t distrust refugees. They distrust the federal government, because they have seen the federal government’s deliberate failures and deliberate lies about illegal immigrants.”
I’m not alone in saying that people are justified in their distrust of the political establishment’s immigration fecklessness. Richard Fernandez wrote more recently that:
A much simpler explanation for the fear which drives the Trump crowds is a loss of confidence in government assurances that they will keep the public safe.
…
The desire for a moratorium on Muslim immigration may be driven less by a distrust of foreigners than by a deep suspicion of the Obama administration’s screening procedures which have so signally failed. Yet after all these fiascos the administration demands ever-greater powers to spy, not only on the NRA but on Muslims too!
Donald Trump is mostly the fault of the political establishment. They have trained people to accept politicians who lie to them, in the hope that on one important policy the politician will at least keep a few of their promises.
A person can only be lied to so much before they just stop listening, and there are few topics in politics where we’ve been lied to more than on immigration.
The political and intellectual establishment has been doing what they always do when reasonable concerns are raised against their policies: crying that their opponents are mean, or, in this case, racist.
When people raised concerns about giving a pass to immigrants who are by definition criminals the establishment called them racist.
When people raised concerns about terrorists sneaking through our poorly-designed legal immigration system, the establishment called them racist, and heartless for wanting to break up families.
When people raised concerns that letting immigrants bypass the normal immigration process, simply by saying that they’re refugees, might let terrorists in, the establishment called them racist, and heartless for opposing all these children and widows.
They were obviously wrong about these things even without the benefit of hindsight. With the benefit of hindsight, we can see the extent of their lies.
A broken immigration system may not be the worst source of crime in the United States, but it is one we potentially have a lot of control over.
Trump’s call to simply ban all Muslims from entering picked up his polls because it bypasses all of the lies of the political establishment, which, ironically, he is a part of.
I worry that Trump is a blowhard who would be as bad for the country as any other Democrat, so I’m going to tell you the secret to cutting him down:
Take his supporters seriously.
- Make serious efforts to stop illegal immigration.
- Make serious efforts to remove the benefits of breaking the law to people who break the law.
- Fix the legal immigration system so that it makes a serious attempt to keep criminals—by United States standards, of course—from moving to the United States.
- Ultimately, the reformed immigration system should work so well that there is no need to bypass it for refugees.
And preface all of this by putting the entire immigration system on hold. Because the problem is that lip service to immigration policy improvements has led people to reasonably fear that any reform will be drawn out and ultimately abandoned, leaving the old, crappy system in place with even more holes in it.
The only way to counter Trump’s immigration policy is for the left—and I say this bipartisanly, meaning the left in both parties—to admit that they were wrong and fix the problems they have caused.
If you keep trying to pull the tactic of the anointed of calling everyone who disagrees with you evil, you will personally be electing President Trump. He’ll be your fault.1
The people who will elect Trump to the presidency—currently a majority of the voting public shares his views on the fecklessness of the federal government’s immigration system—will not believe you unless you first atone for your past lies.
At its most basic, this means changing our immigration policy so that all immigration which is supported is legal, and all immigration that is illegal is opposed either by our police or military powers.
I’m not even saying that you have to give up your ideal of an open border. But you can only have this after you prove that you’re serious about immigration security. Immigration policy could very well be a policy as simple as, if you come in through the front door and you pass a simple background check, you can enter the country. But because of your past mistakes (and here I speak of politicians, not immigrants) the security at the border must be serious and effective.
- Entry to the United States should only be allowed at the front door. Any attempt to enter by the back door is evidence of terrorism or criminal intent and will be stopped, with lethal force if necessary. If you don’t like the idea of lethal force, build the damn wall.
- The background check system must be completely overhauled so that it is reliable. If someone says publicly that they want to take part in violent jihad, the assumption should be that they want to take part in violent jihad.
- The entire system of allowing relatives to bypass standard immigration vetting must be ended. Entrants must be judged on an individual basis. And this includes so-called birthright citizenship. If you want open borders and a welfare state, the path to citizenship cannot be that your non-citizen parents managed to come across while they were pregnant. It’s not necessarily a bad policy—I support it—but you, politicians, have abused it so much that you cannot be trusted with it. We can revisit it after you prove you are truly serious about immigration reform and border security.
Really, that’s the key. Prove that you are truly serious about immigration reform and border security, and do it now, before the election process begins.
Here’s the thing about Trump’s popularity: nobody trusts Donald Trump. They just trust you less.
In response to Election 2016: Another fine mess you’ve gotten us into.
Honestly, given the way the media play into his hands, I occasionally think they’ll be okay with President Trump. They’re giving him air time that other candidates aren’t getting, and whenever an attack on Trump raises his polls, they keep attacking him in that manner.
↑
immigration
- DHS Official Unable to Give Number of Syrians in U.S. or Number of Expired Visas: Adam Kredo
- “A senior Department of Homeland Security official was unable to tell Congress the number of Syrian refugees who have entered the United States in the last year and the number of Americans who have travelled to Syria and returned, in testimony on Capitol Hill that angered many lawmakers.” (Memeorandum thread)
- I’ve changed. This is war. Seal the borders. Stop the Visas.: Larry Kudlow at The Daily Caller
- “Here’s what we must do: Completely reform the vetting process for immigrants and foreign visitors. Change the screening process. Come up with a new visa-application review process. Stop this nonsense of marriage-visa fraud. And in the meantime, seal the borders.” (Hat tip to Ace at Ace of Spades HQ)
- U.S. Visa Process Missed San Bernardino Wife’s Zealotry on Social Media at The New York Times
- “Tashfeen Malik, who with her husband carried out the massacre in San Bernardino, Calif., passed three background checks by American immigration officials as she moved to the United States from Pakistan. None uncovered what Ms. Malik had made little effort to hide—that she talked openly on social media about her views on violent jihad. She said she supported it. And she said she wanted to be a part of it.” (Memeorandum thread)
- Why Americans distrust Obama’s refugee policy
- The reason states are taking immigration law into their own hands is that the federal government isn’t doing its job. The reason this is politically popular is that Americans can see how dangerous the federal government’s policy of ignoring illegal immigration criminals is.
President Donald Trump
- Choose Your Fascism: Richard Fernandez
- “Donald Trump’s proposal to bar Muslims from entering the US is, as Senator Ted Cruz points out, manifestly wrong but also emotionally resonant. Amy Davidson of the New Yorker came face to face with this contradiction after noting the approving crowds which cheered Trump’s plans in South Carolina on Monday night. How can a wrong idea be resonant?” (Hat tip to Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit)
- Donald Trump may be a dangerous buffoon: David Harsanyi at Reason Magazine
- “Marinus van der Lubbe may not have burned down the German Parliament, but Islamic terrorists actually did gun down a bunch of Americans last week. Yet storm troopers didn’t smash Muslim businesses in a fury of collective punishment; a concentration camp for political opponents of Trump was not established this year; there’s been no decree banning Muslims from practicing law and civil service jobs; and there have been no prohibitions on Islamic dietary laws.” (Hat tip to Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit)
- KIMBERLEY STRASSEL: No Political Guardrails: Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit
- “President Obama broke all the boundaries—and now Clinton and Trump are following suit.” (Memeorandum thread)
More illegal immigration
- “Jobs Americans won’t do” is pure BS
- Not only is “Jobs Americans won’t do” bullshit, everyone knows it’s bullshit. Not only will Americans do dirty jobs, in a country of 400 million there are a lot of people who love to do these jobs.
- Why Americans distrust Obama’s refugee policy
- The reason states are taking immigration law into their own hands is that the federal government isn’t doing its job. The reason this is politically popular is that Americans can see how dangerous the federal government’s policy of ignoring illegal immigration criminals is.
More President Donald Trump
- Trump, tariffs, and the war on American workers
- Why do so many American workers support Trump so strongly against the wishes of their union leadership? Partly because only Trump recognizes that we’re in a war targeting American workers.
- Walk toward the fire
- Trump reassures crowd after assassination attempt fails.
- Trump and the January 6 defendants
- There appears to be a concerted effort on conservative forums to blame Trump for not doing anything for the January 6 prisoners and defendants. Is it true?
- Betrayal is bad advice
- It makes sense that the beltway would want to depress voter turnout by working class voters. It’s a mistake for Trump supporters to do so.
- Who is Trump running against?
- If Trump runs against Biden, he’ll lose, just like he did in 2020: by getting more votes but fewer ballots. It looks like Trump understands that. He’s not running against Biden. He’s running against the Democrats and Republicans who put Biden in power.
- 30 more pages with the topic President Donald Trump, and other related pages