Discouraging health insurance competition
This past week I received my 2010 health benefit packet from my employer. With all the talk about better health insurance systems, I thought I should look into getting my own private insurance and pocketing the difference: our employer will transfer the up-front costs of health insurance back to us if we get our own insurance. While obviously this won’t include the costs my employer incurs by having to manage health insurance in the first place, it is a significant amount of money. I’d get $310 added to my monthly salary if I declined my employer’s insurance. What with the lack of a raise this year, that’s tempting.
So I went online and found that here in California, a high-deductible plan would be about $180. That’s more expensive than what I’ve been hearing from people in other parts of the country, but still, that’s an extra $130 a month; of course, after taxes, I’d only pocket about $100, but a hundred dollars a month is nothing to sneeze at1. My health care costs don’t run anywhere near $100 a month.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t work out that way. The problem is something Senator McCain talked about last year, and what the Republican plan tries to fix2: the government doesn’t like individuals and actively discourages them from customizing their health insurance. When my employer “gives” me $310 in health insurance I don’t get taxed on that $310. When they instead leave my salary $310 higher every month and let me get my own insurance, I am taxed on it. Instead of $100 a month extra for getting a personalized high-deductible plan, I’d end up about $30 ahead every month. The $310 gets reduced to about $210 after taxes. Less the $180 for insurance, leaves $30. Given the high price of health care—caused, in part, by this disincentive—I probably do pay something near that.
My next thought was, my employer manages a medical flexible spending account. Can I just have them deposit the $180 a month into that, and use it to pay for insurance? No. Congress really, really doesn’t want me buying my own insurance: flexible spending accounts aren’t that flexible. I’m forbidden from using insurance premiums as an FSA expense. I knew before looking into it that my employer has a government incentive to provide health insurance; I hadn’t realize just how much I’m discouraged from getting my own. The current system hates competition.
And yet that’s what the Democrat’s plan doubles down on: a massive central authority far bigger than any individual employer, less individual choice (more mandates) and a government-run option to rule them all. Free choice is the driving force of competition. This poor policy doesn’t just raise my health care costs; it raises your costs, too, because it discourages competition. It raises the cost of your health insurance (that is, the amount your paycheck needs to be reduced by), and it raises the costs of the health care that insurance pays for.
We don’t need a 2,000 page bill to make health insurance more competitive. We just need to stop discouraging people from making their own choices.
Sorry.
↑Of course, if they’d tried to fix it four years ago, we and they wouldn’t be in this fix today.
↑
- Flexible spending account at Wikipedia
- “A medical FSA cannot pay for health insurance premiums, cosmetic items, cosmetic surgery, or items that improve ‘general health’. All items must be intended to treat or prevent a specific medical condition; this can be as significant as diabetes or pregnancy, or as trivial as skin cuts.”
- Government Takeover is a Double-Edged Sword: Philip Klein
- “But there should be a very important lesson in this. If you don’t want government to be involved with dictating what kind of insurance people can purchase with their own money, then don’t support a health care bill that forces individuals to purchase government-designed insurance policies from a government-run store.”
- Masterfleece Theater: David Harsanyi at Reason Magazine
- “As you flip through the pages of the House bill, you will notice the word ‘regulation’ appears 181 times. ‘Tax’ is there 214 times. ‘Fees,’ 103 times. As we all know, nothing says ‘affordability’ like higher taxes and fees. The word ‘shall’—as in ‘must’ or ‘required to’—appears more than 3,000 times. The word, alas, never is preceded by the patriotic phrase ‘mind our own freaking business.’”
More health care
- COVID Lessons: The Health Care Shutdown
- It’s fortunate that COVID-19 was not as bad as the experts said, because our response was almost entirely to make the problem worse. We shut down everything that could help, including health care for co-morbidities. We locked the healthy and the sick together, and cut people off from routine care. Most of the deaths “from” COVID-19 were probably due more to our response than to the virus itself.
- Community health acts to improve Obamacare
- Democrats now want to talk about how to improve Obamacare. Here’s how to do it.
- Why government-funded cancer research is dangerously unlike the Manhattan Project
- A “Manhattan Project” for cancer is likely to delay cancer cures, and make what cancer cures we find more expensive—like the Epipen. And kill people, like the original Manhattan Project.
- Why does the EpiPen cost so much?
- With Mylan raising the cost of the EpiPen even as the EpiPen enters the public domain, people are complaining—but they’re complaining in ways that will raise health costs even more.
- Strangling the iPhone of health care
- We have no idea what great improvements in health care we have strangled through our current system of government regulations, subsidies, and tax incentives.
- 17 more pages with the topic health care, and other related pages
More insurance
- Firewall affordable care act failures
- Because Senate Democrats are not going to repeal the mess that is the ACA, we need to firewall the failing parts of it in order to keep health care and health insurance costs from escalating too much.
- Health care reform: walking into quicksand
- The first step, when you walk into quicksand, is to walk back out. Health providers today are in the business of dealing with human resources departments and government agencies. Their customers are bureaucrats. Their best innovations will be in the fields of paperwork and red tape. If we want their innovations to be health care innovations, their customers need to be their patients.
- Government-run insurance
- Government organizations don’t have any incentive to sell you shit. Their goal is to tax you. Providing services or products is only an excuse to tax.
- Keep plucking that Congress
- The more people who can afford their own health care and insurance, the easier it will be to care for the rest.