Trump’s rally: the media is the dog
I went to DC on Tuesday, January 5, thinking it would be interesting to see a Trump rally, and have some good food in the process. Most of the DC restaurants I enjoyed the last time I was there several years ago seemed to still be open, at least for delivery. And of course I also wandered local bookstores and record stores.
I also expected that the reporting on the event would be vastly different from the experience, and that the difference between what I saw first hand and what the media reported would be interesting.
I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building, to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.
Trump did not incite a riot. He asked us to march peacefully to the capitol, and then if Congress didn’t call for an investigation into fraud, if states didn’t improve their election processes in the future, for us to go home and primary politicians who oppose open elections. And to work for election security in state legislatures. There was nowhere where he asked for, implied a need for, or gave any impression of a desire for, any action other than going home and starting a long term political engagement.
Literally everyone I saw at the rally heard the same thing I did. People who say Trump called for violence have to theorize special mental powers that send invisible commands:
He has a way of inciting his followers to do things…
It reminds me of the quote that if you can hear the dog whistle, you’re the dog.
The thing we adore about these dog-whistle kerfuffles is that the people who react to the whistle always assume it’s intended for somebody else. The whole point of the metaphor is that if you can hear the whistle, you’re the dog. — James Taranto (Lutey Tunes)
Violence is an article of faith with the media that can’t be countered by asking them to actually listen to the speech. But I was there, and listened; his speech was literally the opposite of calling for violence. He said that if congress didn’t do the right thing, we should go back home and primary the hell out of them when they were up for reelection.1
For that matter, where I was, there was nothing even close to rioting, just milling around talking about the weather on the Mall and the grounds around the Capitol—people from Texas and Florida complaining about the cold, people from Michigan and Iowa loving the warmth.
When I arrived at the Capitol there were empty cars, including empty police vehicles, all over the parking lot in front of the building, and not a single one that I could see was molested in any way. No flipping, no burning, no broken windows, not even walking on them. People just walked around them, talked with their friends, and sang some of the eighties rock song that had been playing during the rally.
When I left the Capitol it wasn’t because I was worried about rioting but because I was bored. I started leaving a few minutes before Mayor Bowser’s curfew order came over the cell network. I was just at the edge of the grounds when I heard my and everyone else’s phones go off with the curfew order.2 I stopped and looked around; where I was, I couldn’t see any reason for it.
DC appeared not to have noticed it either. I walked over a mile from the Capitol to NOMA3 where my hotel was. I walked back out again to eat. Traffic, business, people strolling, continued as normal. Businesses weren’t afraid of being vandalized and looted, nobody was boarding up their windows. All the things we’ve seen in the past year elsewhere, I didn’t see in DC that evening.
I should add that the curfew was announced well ahead of time, leaving me enough time to walk the mile and change back to my hotel, find an interesting restaurant that was open, walk there, have a drink, eat oysters and a lobster roll, return to my hotel by way of a Harris Teeter to get water, and open up the bread pudding I’d got as takeout from the restaurant after eating too much food to have dessert immediately after dinner.
The next morning, DC continued on as normal. I walked over ten miles on Thursday, from pastry shop to bookstore to pastry shop to record store to pastry shop to bookstore4 to pastry shop… and everyone was open, all of the merchants were happy to see customers, police presence on the streets appeared to be minimal. No different than it was six years ago on my last visit except for a lot more masks.
In fact I was surprised at how little of a police presence there was even at the march. There were police at the intersections guiding the marchers down Constitution Avenue (and, I would expect, down Pennsylvania Avenue) and a few around the edges of the Capitol grounds. I didn’t see any up at the Capitol building itself. I hadn’t known at the time that Mayor Bowser had refused additional security, a strange decision when you expect tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of people to show. It’s very easy for a handful of bad actors to hide in a crowd that big.
I’ve deliberately avoided media coverage of the event, partly because of Jefferson’s admonition that people who watch the news are more ignorant than those who don’t5 but because I wanted to keep my memories clean while writing this. I wanted to report what I saw and heard, with my own photos to help.
It was impossible to stay completely clean, of course, and this would be a very short post if I limited myself to what I saw—nothing was happening. The media coverage seems to vastly exaggerate or completely misreport even the video they’re highlighting. One video I couldn’t resist watching is titled by multiple media outlets using it as “Video shows police officers stand by and do nothing as rioters charge into US Capitol”.
Take a look at those “charging rioters”. The reason I couldn’t resist watching it was because the comments below the video were completely at odds with the headline. The commenters had to be lying. There is no way that charging rioters walked up the stairs politely to one side.
I should rephrase that. Either random commenters on the Internet were lying, or the newspaper was lying, and I honestly thought that the comments had to at least be exaggerations.
So I watched it. Against all odds6 random Internet commenters were more trustworthy than major news sources. I’m not happy with the language, but either the police let the protestors in or the doors (to a public building) were unlocked; the protestors were not going somewhere they weren’t allowed to go. They stop with the language after they enter the building; they go only where the police allow them to go. After they walk past the police, they file in an orderly manner up the stairs. All but one of them stay to the side to allow down traffic past. And that one person immediately moves to the side with the rest when they see another person coming down the stairs.
Are they rioting or going on a Capitol tour?
This isn’t just my interpretation. Take a look at the person coming down the stairs. That lone person going the other way did not seem in any way frightened or worried at having to pass those “charging rioters”.
Those are the most orderly charging rioters I have ever seen footage of. And I didn’t pull this from a friendly site, but from a newspaper that tried to characterize the people filing past officers and keeping to the side to let traffic pass as “charging” and “rioting”.
Obviously, I can’t know about rioting somewhere I wasn’t. Nor can I know whether Trump is right or wrong about election fraud. The reason I can’t know about the former is that the media is clearly completely untrustworthy. And the reason I can’t know the latter is that data that should be open to inspection is hidden. It freaks me out that so many election officials chose to hide what ought to be public data. All we have to go on are indicators that sure seem to indicate massive fraud.
An acquaintance did see some illegal activity; one person tried to break a window—and everyone around them pushed the window-breaker away to stop them, yelling obscenities about antifa. Michael Yon says he saw a lot of similar activity and also attributed it to antifa.
This was a camera-rich environment. Those caught on video smashing windows, attacking people, and breaking things, should be prosecuted, just as the rioters burning cars, smashing windows, and attacking people should have been prosecuted over the last year. And those who tried to stop the criminal activity should be praised. I suspect there were more Trump supporters among the latter than the former.
But more protests as polite as the one displayed in this video and what I saw in DC—especially if there’s a history of holding true rioters accountable—and we might start having honest conversations in politics again.
Minus the eighties rock.
In response to 2020 in Photos: For photos, memes, and perhaps other quick notes sent from my mobile device or written on the fly during 2020.
Probably long-term engagement by voters is what frightens the media most.
↑Essential workers were exempt from the curfew; DC includes “the media” as essential workers.
↑NOMA is “North of Massachusetts Avenue”.
↑I picked up a copy of Arned Hinshaw’s Heartbreak Ridge and Umberto Eco’s The Prague Cemetery, both of which are great books.
↑… the man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. — Thomas Jefferson (Letter to John Norvell, June 14, 1807)
↑Yes, there is an invisible sarcasm tag around that phrase. SARC tags are not XHTML compliant.
↑
beltway class
- Before Capitol Riot, D.C. Mayor Rejected Federal Law-Enforcement Assistance: Robert Stacy McCain at The Other McCain
- “If you’re wondering how a mob so easily overwhelmed security at the Capitol on Wednesday, look no further than D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser.”
- The Deep State is Rattled: Steven Hayward at Power Line
- “Among other things, the fact that apparently some Capitol Police were friendly with the protestors who entered the building have federal bureaucrats wondering whether they can fully trust their own security personnel.”
- Potemkin Parliament, Pseudo-Legislature: Mark Steyn at Steyn Online
- “As I said earlier, I find myself at odds with virtually the entire politico-media class in my reaction to the ‘storming’ of the US Capitol.”
- President Trump Takes a Hit for the Team: Jack Cashill at American Thinker
- “The benefits came in two primary forms: what Trump accomplished as president and what he exposed. The last few months, and the last week especially, were all about exposure.”
Trump rally
- Bar Products CEO Statement: Mark Hastings
- “We came in peace, we brought no weapons, we brought no fire and we did not mask our identity. We brought our flags, we brought our unity and we brought our deep love for our country.”
- Here’s what really happened before the incursion into the Capitol: Thomas P. Smith at American Thinker
- “Congress should have been there to see it. If they had been, I’m sure their accusatory rhetoric once they reconvened following the rioter’s break-in would have been much different… They could have seen that the rally was docile except for the cheering, clapping, and flag-waving.”
- I Saw Provocateurs At The Capitol Riot On Jan. 6: J. Michael Waller at The Federalist
- “This article is a first-person, eyewitness account drafted the night of Jan. 6 and morning of Jan. 7, so it is not affected by other news coverage or information. The only research aids used in this article were photos and videos that I took from my phone.”
- Let me tell you about my experience at yesterday's Trump Rally.: PlanetMoron at Not the Bee
- “It was such a fun, interesting, historic, and in some ways fulfilling day for me, that my mind just edits out the poor weather.”
- Trump addresses supporters rallying near the White House | Jan. 6, 2021
- “President Donald Trump addresses supporters rallying near the White House as Congress prepared to affirm President-elect Joe Biden's victory. ”
- Which of These Words Spoken by Trump Would Cause You to Riot?: Victoria Taft at PJ Media
- “That doesn’t sound like someone calling for a mass riot and civil unrest… In fact, the president ended with a message of hope and a call for the march to the Capitol… There had never been such a riot before by Trump supporters. Why would he assume there would be one now?… Watch the rally and the president’s speech for yourself and ask, ‘What would it take to get me to lay siege to the Capitol building?’”
violence
- No, Trump Did Not Incite Violence: Robert Stacy McCain at The Other McCain
- “Ann Althouse—who, I remind you, is a professor of law at the University of Wisconsin—took the time to read the transcript of Trump’s hour-long speech Wednesday and found no such incitement. It simply never happened, no matter how often the media say it happened.”
- Trump’s Rally Speech Was Not Illegal “Incitement”: Fuzzy Slippers at Legal Insurrection
- “The latest premise Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats are pushing to impeach President Trump… and claim that his rhetoric ‘incited insurrection’… The problem with this claim is the speech itself.”
- ‘Agent Provocateur’ Tactics Seen at Jan 6 US Capitol Protest
- “The United States is still making sense of what took place on Jan 6 at Capitol Hill in Washington DC, and among the accusations has been that the radical organization Antifa was involved at the protests. To learn more about this we've invited to speak with us Michael Yon, a war correspondent who has attended hundreds of protests, and who has deep insights into Antifa and their tactics.” (Hat tip to Michael Yon)
More Election 2020
- The Immaculate Deception: The Navarro Report 2.0
- “This report assesses the fairness and integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election by examining six dimensions of alleged election irregularities across six key battleground states. Evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations, testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage.”
- The Silver Blaze Media and the Gaslight Election
- This isn’t just the Gaslight election, it’s the Silver Blaze election.
- Only what Facebook wants you to see?
- To spread darkness, Facebook reduces the distribution of content they don’t want you to see, about news that is very important to a functioning democracy.
More January 6
- Trump and the January 6 defendants
- There appears to be a concerted effort on conservative forums to blame Trump for not doing anything for the January 6 prisoners and defendants. Is it true?
- January 6 nightmare worthy of Kafka
- January 6 prisoners have been in jail for longer than the punishment for what DC claims they did, and they haven’t even been convicted yet.
- Free the January 6 prisoners
- It’s been over a year now since some of these people were imprisoned; there is no reason for any of them to be held without bail.
- The January 6 witch-hunt
- If there’s a witch-hunt starting, I’ve decided it’s best to identify as a witch.
More President Donald Trump
- Trump, tariffs, and the war on American workers
- Why do so many American workers support Trump so strongly against the wishes of their union leadership? Partly because only Trump recognizes that we’re in a war targeting American workers.
- Walk toward the fire
- Trump reassures crowd after assassination attempt fails.
- Trump and the January 6 defendants
- There appears to be a concerted effort on conservative forums to blame Trump for not doing anything for the January 6 prisoners and defendants. Is it true?
- Betrayal is bad advice
- It makes sense that the beltway would want to depress voter turnout by working class voters. It’s a mistake for Trump supporters to do so.
- Who is Trump running against?
- If Trump runs against Biden, he’ll lose, just like he did in 2020: by getting more votes but fewer ballots. It looks like Trump understands that. He’s not running against Biden. He’s running against the Democrats and Republicans who put Biden in power.
- 30 more pages with the topic President Donald Trump, and other related pages
More Trump rally
- Walk toward the fire
- Trump reassures crowd after assassination attempt fails.
- The January 6 witch-hunt
- If there’s a witch-hunt starting, I’ve decided it’s best to identify as a witch.